Last patch for the night. There's still a bit of minor fallout left in
GCC (loongarch testsuite for example). But things are looking good on
the targets I test. The plan is to start submitting the various
newlib/libgloss fixes tomorrow.
Anyway, this test was the one I was most concerned about. Basically
we're testing that on a !dfp target that the builtins are not available.
It expects a warning, but gets an error by default now. I just
changed the test to use -fpermissive, so that the test behaves as it did
previously.
Pushed to the trunk.
Jeff
commit f37744662cbc74efcceb790b99dcd6521c51a578
Author: Jeff Law <j...@ventanamicro.com>
Date: Sat Dec 2 22:54:46 2023 -0700
[committed] Fix gnu23-builtins-no-dfp
Last patch for the night. There's still a bit of minor fallout left in GCC
(loongarch testsuite for example). But things are looking good on the
targets
I test. The plan is to start submitting the various newlib/libgloss fixes
tomorrow.
Anyway, this test was the one I was most concerned about. Basically we're
testing that on a !dfp target that the builtins are not available. It
expects
a warning, but gets an error by default now. I just changed the test to use
-fpermissive, so that the test behaves as it did previously.
Pushed to the trunk.
gcc/testsuite
* gcc.dg/gnu23-builtins-no-dfp-1.c: Add -fpermissive.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gnu23-builtins-no-dfp-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gnu23-builtins-no-dfp-1.c
index 9fa25f0dd13..8fe4efbdd98 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gnu23-builtins-no-dfp-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gnu23-builtins-no-dfp-1.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/* Test C23 built-in functions: test DFP built-in functions are not
available when no DFP support. Bug 91985. */
/* { dg-do compile { target { ! dfp } } } */
-/* { dg-options "-std=gnu23" } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=gnu23 -fpermissive" } */
int fabsd32 (void);
int fabsd64 (void);