Oleg Endo wrote:
> The attached patch addresses one thing which I mentioned in PR 22553
> comment #27. Some of the FP insns take "arith_reg_operand", which seems
> a bit off. I haven't checked whether it fixes the original problem of
> PR 22553, but anyway it's probably better to use "fp_arith_r
Hello,
The attached patch addresses one thing which I mentioned in PR 22553
comment #27. Some of the FP insns take "arith_reg_operand", which seems
a bit off. I haven't checked whether it fixes the original problem of
PR 22553, but anyway it's probably better to use "fp_arith_reg_operand"
for FP
