Oleg Endo <oleg.e...@t-online.de> wrote:
> The attached patch addresses one thing which I mentioned in PR 22553
> comment #27. Some of the FP insns take "arith_reg_operand", which seems
> a bit off. I haven't checked whether it fixes the original problem of
> PR 22553, but anyway it's probably better to use "fp_arith_reg_operand"
> for FP insns.
>
> Tested on rev 204263 with
> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4-single/
> -ml,-m4-single/-mb,-m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}"
>
> and no new failures.
> OK for trunk?
OK.
Regards,
kaz
