Oleg Endo wrote:
> The attached patch adds gcc.target/sh/torture and puts the test there.
> The torture subdir might be also useful in the future.
> Tested on rev 192417 with
> make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim\{-m2/-ml}"
>
> OK?
OK.
Regards,
kaz
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 07:46 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Oleg Endo wrote:
> > Uhm, yes, I forgot to add the -fschedule-insns and -mprefergot options.
> > Regarding the -Os option, I think it's better to test this one at
> > multiple optimization levels, just in case. I've looked through
> > gcc.c-t
Oleg Endo wrote:
> Uhm, yes, I forgot to add the -fschedule-insns and -mprefergot options.
> Regarding the -Os option, I think it's better to test this one at
> multiple optimization levels, just in case. I've looked through
> gcc.c-torture/compile and found some target specific test cases there,
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 18:33 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Oleg Endo wrote:
> > This adds the reduced test case as mentioned by Kaz in the PR to the
> > test suite.
> > Tested with
> > make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="compile.exp=pr34777*
> > --target_board=sh-sim
> > \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml
Oleg Endo wrote:
> This adds the reduced test case as mentioned by Kaz in the PR to the
> test suite.
> Tested with
> make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="compile.exp=pr34777*
> --target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
>
> OK?
It should be put into gcc.ta
Hello,
This adds the reduced test case as mentioned by Kaz in the PR to the
test suite.
Tested with
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="compile.exp=pr34777*
--target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
OK?
Cheers,
Oleg
testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR target/
