Oleg Endo <oleg.e...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Uhm, yes, I forgot to add the -fschedule-insns and -mprefergot options.
> Regarding the -Os option, I think it's better to test this one at
> multiple optimization levels, just in case. I've looked through
> gcc.c-torture/compile and found some target specific test cases there,
> so I thought it would be OK to do the same :)
> Some targets also have their own torture subdir. If it's better, I
> could also create gcc.target/sh/torture.
Maybe. For this specific test, I thought that "-Os -fschedule-insns
-fPIC -mprefergot" would be enough because empirically these options
will give high R0 register pressure which had caused that PR.
Regards,
kaz
