Hi Richard,
Pinging for further comments.
regards,
Venkat.
On 27 November 2013 14:24, Venkataramanan Kumar
wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>> I don't think it's good to have long lists of targets on generic tests.
>> Can we factor this out into a target-supports option?
>
> I have updated the patch as
Hi Richard,
> I don't think it's good to have long lists of targets on generic tests.
> Can we factor this out into a target-supports option?
I have updated the patch as per your recommendation. Please let me
know if it is fine.
2013-11-26 Venkataramanan Kumar
* configure.ac (gcc_cv_
On 26/11/13 14:16, Venkataramanan Kumar wrote:
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fstack-protector-strong.c
> ===
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fstack-protector-strong.c(revision 205378)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fstack-protector-strong.c
Hi Joseph/Jakub,
Attached is Version 2 patch that adds machine descriptions for stack
protection in Aarch64. I have removed the incorrect test case changes
from the previous patch.
To make GCC compatible with glibc, I have added a test for aarch64 in
"GCC/configure".
This tests for the glibc vers
Hi Joseph,
Thank you for the detail explanation.
> You need to ensure that, when new glibc is built, whatever compiler it's
> built with, it continues to export the __stack_chk_guard symbol at version
> GLIBC_2.17. Furthermore, if any released GCC version would generate
> references to __stack_c
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Venkataramanan Kumar wrote:
> > I would like to see a clear description of what happens with all eight
> > combinations of (glibc version does or doesn't support this, GCC building
> > glibc does or doesn't support this, GCC building user program does or
> > doesn't support th
Hi Joseph,
On 19 November 2013 21:53, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 04:30:21PM +0530, Venkataramanan Kumar wrote:
>> > This is RFC patch that adds machine descriptions to support stack
>> > smashing protection in AArch64.
>>
>> Mos
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 04:30:21PM +0530, Venkataramanan Kumar wrote:
> > This is RFC patch that adds machine descriptions to support stack
> > smashing protection in AArch64.
>
> Most of the testsuite changes look wrong. The fact that aarch64
> gets s
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 04:30:21PM +0530, Venkataramanan Kumar wrote:
> This is RFC patch that adds machine descriptions to support stack
> smashing protection in AArch64.
Most of the testsuite changes look wrong. The fact that aarch64
gets stack protector support doesn't mean all other targets d
Hi Maintainers,
This is RFC patch that adds machine descriptions to support stack
smashing protection in AArch64.
I have written a very simple patch that prints "stack set" and "stack
test" as template of instructions.
I had 2 assumptions.
1) For "stack_protect_set" and "stack_protect_test", I
10 matches
Mail list logo
