On 26/11/13 14:16, Venkataramanan Kumar wrote:
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fstack-protector-strong.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fstack-protector-strong.c (revision 205378)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fstack-protector-strong.c (working copy)
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> /* Test that stack protection is done on chosen functions. */
>
> -/* { dg-do compile { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* rs6000-*-* s390x-*-* } } */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* rs6000-*-* s390x-*-*
> aarch64-*-* } } */
> /* { dg-options "-O2 -fstack-protector-strong" } */
>
I don't think it's good to have long lists of targets on generic tests.
Can we factor this out into a target-supports option?
R.
