On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:37:33AM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
> > Okay for trunk. For backports maybe wait a bit longer than usual? So ask
> > again in two weeks, maybe? I know it's important for the darwin port, but
> > the generic part is a little scary.
>
> No
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Okay for trunk. For backports maybe wait a bit longer than usual? So ask
> again in two weeks, maybe? I know it's important for the darwin port, but
> the generic part is a little scary.
No problem (I would like to get this in to the final issue of 7, if possible).
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 01:46:41PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:39:51PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 10:13:16PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> > > For 32bit cases this isn't a problem since we can load/store to unaligned
> > > addresses using D-
Okay for trunk. For backports maybe wait a bit longer than usual? So ask
again in two weeks, maybe? I know it's important for the darwin port, but
the generic part is a little scary.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 10:13:16PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> 2) To resolve this we need to extend the handling
Thanks for the reviews, Segher, Alan,
Alan Modra wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:39:51PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 10:13:16PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>> For 32bit cases this isn't a problem since we can load/store to unaligned
>>> addresses using D-mode i
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:39:51PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 10:13:16PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> > For 32bit cases this isn't a problem since we can load/store to unaligned
> > addresses using D-mode insns.
>
> Can you? -m32 -mpowerpc64? We did have a bug with
Hi,
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 10:13:16PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
(this is a bug reported against Fortran, but actually is a generic insn
selection problem for m64 powerpc-darwin. In fact, I’d say it renders
the 64b multilib unusable).
The solution proposed is Darwi
Hi!
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 10:13:16PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> (this is a bug reported against Fortran, but actually is a generic insn
> selection problem for m64 powerpc-darwin. In fact, I’d say it renders
> the 64b multilib unusable).
>
> The solution proposed is Darwin-local (it's a lon
Hi Folks,
(this is a bug reported against Fortran, but actually is a generic insn
selection problem for m64 powerpc-darwin. In fact, I’d say it renders
the 64b multilib unusable).
The solution proposed is Darwin-local (it's a long-standing bug and it
would be intended to back-port it). Howeve
