Terry Guo wrote:
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "movs\tr\[0-9\]" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "lsrs\tr\[0-9\]" { target arm_thumb2_ok } }
> } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "movs\tr\[0-9\]" { target { ! arm_thumb2_ok
> } } } } */
This causes the arm.exp testcase to fail with
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Earnshaw
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 10:00 PM
> To: Terry Guo
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Patch ARM] Update the test case to differ movs and lsrs
> for ARM mode and non-ARM mode
>
> On 22/0
On 22/08/12 12:16, Terry Guo wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Due to the impact of ARM UAL, the Thumb1 and Thumb2 mode use LSRS
>>> instruction while the ARM mode uses MOVS instruction. So the
>> following case
>>> is updated accordingly. Is it OK to trunk?
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Terry
>>>
>>> 2012-08-21 Terry Guo
>>
> >
> > Due to the impact of ARM UAL, the Thumb1 and Thumb2 mode use LSRS
> > instruction while the ARM mode uses MOVS instruction. So the
> following case
> > is updated accordingly. Is it OK to trunk?
> >
> > BR,
> > Terry
> >
> > 2012-08-21 Terry Guo
> >
> > * gcc.target/arm/combine-
On 22/08/12 02:20, Terry Guo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to the impact of ARM UAL, the Thumb1 and Thumb2 mode use LSRS
> instruction while the ARM mode uses MOVS instruction. So the following case
> is updated accordingly. Is it OK to trunk?
>
> BR,
> Terry
>
> 2012-08-21 Terry Guo
>
> * gc
Hi,
Due to the impact of ARM UAL, the Thumb1 and Thumb2 mode use LSRS
instruction while the ARM mode uses MOVS instruction. So the following case
is updated accordingly. Is it OK to trunk?
BR,
Terry
2012-08-21 Terry Guo
* gcc.target/arm/combine-movs.c: Check movs for ARM mode
