> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Earnshaw
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 10:00 PM
> To: Terry Guo
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Patch ARM] Update the test case to differ movs and lsrs
> for ARM mode and non-ARM mode
> 
> On 22/08/12 12:16, Terry Guo wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> Due to the impact of ARM UAL, the Thumb1 and Thumb2 mode use LSRS
> >>> instruction while the ARM mode uses MOVS instruction. So the
> >> following case
> >>> is updated accordingly. Is it OK to trunk?
> >>>
> >>> BR,
> >>> Terry
> >>>
> >>> 2012-08-21  Terry Guo  <terry....@arm.com>
> >>>
> >>>         * gcc.target/arm/combine-movs.c: Check movs for ARM mode
> >>>         and lsrs for other mode.
> >>>
> >>
> >> This can't be right.  Thumb1 doesn't use unified syntax.
> >>
> >> R.
> >>
> >
> > oops. You are right. Sorry for making such obvious mistake.
> > Here is patch updated to distinguish ARM and Thumb2.
> > Tested for Thumb1, Thumb2 and ARM modes. No regression.
> >
> > Is it OK?
> >
> > BR,
> > Terry
> >
> > 2012-08-21  Terry Guo  <terry....@arm.com>
> >
> >         * gcc.target/arm/combine-movs.c: Check movs for ARM mode
> >         and lsrs for Thumb2 mode.
> >
> >
> 
> OK.
> 
> R.

Hi Richard,

Is it ok to apply this fix to gcc 4.7 branch?

BR,
Terry


Reply via email to