---On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
> wrote:
>
>>> > I guess since they represent the exact same effective ISA, they would
>>> > have equal priority, so that it would likely chose whatever comes last.
>>>
>>> I have no s
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
wrote:
>> > I guess since they represent the exact same effective ISA, they would
>> > have equal priority, so that it would likely chose whatever comes last.
>>
>> I have no strong opinion on this. But this is a user visible compiler
>> beh
On Monday 26 January 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
>
> wrote:
> > On Monday 26 January 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> Committed with a bunch of fixes (e.g. missing
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:15 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
> wrote:
>> On Monday 26 January 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> Committed with a bunch of fixes (e.g. missing fo
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
wrote:
> On Monday 26 January 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
>>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> >> Committed with a bunch of fixes (e.g. missing fold_builtin_cpu
>> >> >> >> part in gcc/config/i386/i386.c,
On Monday 26 January 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
>
> wrote:
> >> >> >> Committed with a bunch of fixes (e.g. missing fold_builtin_cpu
> >> >> >> part in gcc/config/i386/i386.c, and mv17.C test didn't compile at
> >> >> >> all due to missing paren
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Committed with a bunch of fixes (e.g. missing fold_builtin_cpu part
>> >> >> in gcc/config/i386/i386.c, and mv17.C test didn't compile at all due
>> >> >> to missing parenthesis).
>> >> >
>> >> > ... and now with comm
On Monday 26 January 2015, you wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
>
> wrote:
> > On Monday 26 January 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >> >> On Sat, Jan 24, 2
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
wrote:
> On Monday 26 January 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
>> >>
>> >> w
On Monday 26 January 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Saturday 24 January 2015, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:04 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
>>> wrote:
On Saturday 24 January 2015, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
>> wrote:
>>> On Saturday 24 January 2015, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hel
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
> wrote:
>> On Saturday 24 January 2015, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> > Hello!
>>> >
>>> >>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 01:28:47PM +0100, A
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
wrote:
> On Saturday 24 January 2015, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> >>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 01:28:47PM +0100, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
>> >>> > I recently wanted to use
On Saturday 24 January 2015, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> >>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 01:28:47PM +0100, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> >>> > I recently wanted to use multiversioning for BMI2 specific extensions
> >>> > PDEP/PEXT, and no
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
>>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 01:28:47PM +0100, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
>>> > I recently wanted to use multiversioning for BMI2 specific extensions
>>> > PDEP/PEXT, and noticed it wasn't there. So I wrote this patch to add it,
>>> >
Hello!
>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 01:28:47PM +0100, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
>> > I recently wanted to use multiversioning for BMI2 specific extensions
>> > PDEP/PEXT, and noticed it wasn't there. So I wrote this patch to add it,
>> > and also added AES, F16C and BMI1 for completeness.
>>
>> A
On Wednesday 31 December 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 01:28:47PM +0100, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > I recently wanted to use multiversioning for BMI2 specific extensions
> > PDEP/PEXT, and noticed it wasn't there. So I wrote this patch to add it,
> > and also added AES,
18 matches
Mail list logo