On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen <carew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I guess since they represent the exact same effective ISA, they would >> > have equal priority, so that it would likely chose whatever comes last. >> >> I have no strong opinion on this. But this is a user visible compiler >> behavior change. We should issue a warning/note here. > > Yes, or revert that part of the patch. It should have been a separate patch > anyway. Agreed. HJ, can you please revert this part? The patch from PR is OK. Thanks, Uros.
