On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 03:52:26PM +, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> As I remarked in PR, this fix probably comes 1,379 days too late. I am
> not at all sure that I understand why I couldn't see the problem
> because it is rather trivial.
>
> I am open to not adding the second gcc_assert - it do
As I remarked in PR, this fix probably comes 1,379 days too late. I am
not at all sure that I understand why I couldn't see the problem
because it is rather trivial.
I am open to not adding the second gcc_assert - it does seem like overkill.
Regtested on FC30/x86_64 - OK for trunk and ?
Paul
