On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 03:52:26PM +0000, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > As I remarked in PR, this fix probably comes 1,379 days too late. I am > not at all sure that I understand why I couldn't see the problem > because it is rather trivial. > > I am open to not adding the second gcc_assert - it does seem like overkill. > > Regtested on FC30/x86_64 - OK for trunk and ....? >
Yes. 7-branch is now closed. So, if you're inclined to backport then it is also ok for 8 and 9 branches after testing. -- Steve
