On 07/26/2012 10:00 AM, Mikael Morin wrote:
I assume this sits on top of the previous patch? Then OK for both.
Yes. It was supposed to be a complete patch, but as I screwed up (git
diff vs. git diff --cached, combined with git add), it was only an
interdiff.
Thanks for the review. I committ
On 25/07/2012 23:23, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> The following issue was found by Alessandro. (It got triggered by a
>> larger test case, which is required for a larger patch by Alessandro,
>> which is not yet finished.)
>>
>> Accessing the "lower[-1]" is probably not the best id
Tobias Burnus wrote:
The following issue was found by Alessandro. (It got triggered by a
larger test case, which is required for a larger patch by Alessandro,
which is not yet finished.)
Accessing the "lower[-1]" is probably not the best idea …
Build on x86-64-linux.
OK for the trunk?
I att
The following issue was found by Alessandro. (It got triggered by a
larger test case, which is required for a larger patch by Alessandro,
which is not yet finished.)
Accessing the "lower[-1]" is probably not the best idea …
Build on x86-64-linux.
OK for the trunk?
Tobias
2012-07-25 Alessandr
