On 25/07/2012 23:23, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Tobias Burnus wrote: >> The following issue was found by Alessandro. (It got triggered by a >> larger test case, which is required for a larger patch by Alessandro, >> which is not yet finished.) >> >> Accessing the "lower[-1]" is probably not the best idea … >> >> Build on x86-64-linux. >> OK for the trunk? > > I attached the wrong version – the additional problem was that > mio_integer expects nonnegative numbers. > > Build and tested on x86-64-linux. > OK? > Hello,
I assume this sits on top of the previous patch? Then OK for both. Mikael.
