Naveen, I've committed your original REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE patch.
Cheers
/Marcus
On 8 January 2013 05:09, Hurugalawadi, Naveen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AARCH64 back-end defines REVERSE_CONDITION but not REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE.
> REVERSE_CONDITION is used only in case REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE (mode) is
> nonzero.
>
>
Hi,
Please consider this as a reminder to review the patch posted at
following link:-
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00463.html
Please review the patch and let me know if its okay?
Thanks & Regards,
Naveen.H.S
Hi Marcus,
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
>> Given the comment about SELECT_CC_MODE and the implementation of
>> aarch64_select_cc_mode this definition of REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE looks
>> broken to me.
Please find attached the modified patch that does not allow floating
point inequality comparisons
On 8 January 2013 05:09, Hurugalawadi, Naveen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AARCH64 back-end defines REVERSE_CONDITION but not REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE.
> REVERSE_CONDITION is used only in case REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE (mode) is
> nonzero.
>
> Please find attached the patch that defines REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE for
> aarch64 ba
Hi,
AARCH64 back-end defines REVERSE_CONDITION but not REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE.
REVERSE_CONDITION is used only in case REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE (mode) is
nonzero.
Please find attached the patch that defines REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE for
aarch64 back-end. Please review the patch and let me know if there should be
