On 1/13/19 2:18 PM, Uecker, Martin wrote:
>
> Does this patch have a change? This version seems risk-free and
> is a clear improvement from simply doing nothing for
> '-fno-trampolines'. Also it is useful in situations where
> one cannot have an executable stack.
>
>
> I am currently thinking a
Does this patch have a change? This version seems risk-free and
is a clear improvement from simply doing nothing for
'-fno-trampolines'. Also it is useful in situations where
one cannot have an executable stack.
I am currently thinking about working
around this problem by calling nested functio
Am Montag, den 17.12.2018, 10:28 -0700 schrieb Jeff Law:
> > But the alignment increase itself on 'i386' and 'aarch64'
> > might be unacceptable. In this case, the only safe change
> > is to make the higher alignment also depend on
> > "-fno-trampolines". Would this be acceptable?
>
> Unclear at
