On 1/13/19 2:18 PM, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > Does this patch have a change? This version seems risk-free and > is a clear improvement from simply doing nothing for > '-fno-trampolines'. Also it is useful in situations where > one cannot have an executable stack. > > > I am currently thinking about working > around this problem by calling nested functions with the > following macro (x86_64 only): I'm deferring to gcc-10. We're well into stage4 and that's really where my focus needs to be. If another maintainer wants to push on these, I won't object, but I won't be looking at this issue again until we're into gcc-10 stage1 development.
Jeff
