DD_IMM_FMT_3(uint8_t, 9u)
>
> Pan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 6:53 PM
> To: Jakub Jelinek
> Cc: Li, Pan2 ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Vect: Promote unsigned .SAT_ADD constant operand for
>
nal Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 6:53 PM
> To: Jakub Jelinek
> Cc: Li, Pan2 ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Vect: Promote unsigned .SAT_ADD constant operand for
> vectorizable_call
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 8:36 P
Friday, August 23, 2024 6:53 PM
To: Jakub Jelinek
Cc: Li, Pan2 ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Vect: Promote unsigned .SAT_ADD constant operand for
vectorizable_call
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 8:36 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 01:52:35PM +0200, Richard
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 8:36 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 01:52:35PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 11:18 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 05:03:14AM +, Li, Pan2 wrote:
> > > > Please feel free to let me know if there
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 11:18 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 05:03:14AM +, Li, Pan2 wrote:
> > Please feel free to let me know if there is anything I can do to fix this
> > issue. Thanks a lot.
>
> There is no bug. The operands of .{ADD,SUB,MUL}_OVERFLOW don't have to ha
@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com;
rdapp@gmail.com; Liu, Hongtao
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] Vect: Promote unsigned .SAT_ADD constant operand for
vectorizable_call
Hi Pan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Li, Pan2
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 1:58 AM
>
@gmail.com; Liu, Hongtao
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] Vect: Promote unsigned .SAT_ADD constant operand for
> vectorizable_call
>
> Thanks Jakub and Tamar for comments and suggestions.
>
> The match.pd list as below doesn't check the INT_CST type for .SAT_ADD.
>
> (match (u
elinek
Cc: Li, Pan2 ; Richard Biener ;
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com;
jeffreya...@gmail.com; rdapp@gmail.com; Liu, Hongtao
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] Vect: Promote unsigned .SAT_ADD constant operand for
vectorizable_call
> -Original Message---
gtao
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Vect: Promote unsigned .SAT_ADD constant operand for
> vectorizable_call
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 01:55:38PM +, Tamar Christina wrote:
> > So would this not be the simplest fix:
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-pattern
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 01:55:38PM +, Tamar Christina wrote:
> So would this not be the simplest fix:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
> index 87b3dc413b8..fcbc83a49f0 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
> @@ -4558,6
> Cc: Richard Biener ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; tamar.christ...@arm.com;
> jeffreya...@gmail.com; rdapp....@gmail.com; Liu, Hongtao
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Vect: Promote unsigned .SAT_ADD constant operand for
> vectorizable_c
: Sunday, August 18, 2024 5:21 AM
To: Li, Pan2
Cc: Richard Biener ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; tamar.christ...@arm.com;
jeffreya...@gmail.com; rdapp@gmail.com; Liu, Hongtao
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Vect: Promote unsigned .SAT_ADD constant operand for
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 05:03:14AM +, Li, Pan2 wrote:
> Thanks Richard for confirmation. Sorry almost forget this thread.
>
> Please feel free to let me know if there is anything I can do to fix this
> issue. Thanks a lot.
There is no bug. The operands of .{ADD,SUB,MUL}_OVERFLOW don't have
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 05:03:14AM +, Li, Pan2 wrote:
> Please feel free to let me know if there is anything I can do to fix this
issue. Thanks a lot.
There is no bug. The operands of .{ADD,SUB,MUL}_OVERFLOW don't have to
have the same type, as described in the
__builtin_{add,sub,mul}_overflo
@gcc.gnu.org; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com;
tamar.christ...@arm.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com; rdapp@gmail.com; Liu,
Hongtao ; Jakub Jelinek
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Vect: Promote unsigned .SAT_ADD constant operand for
vectorizable_call
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 3:22 PM Li, Pan2
_3;
> version:4>
> (gdb) call debug_tree (_q41)
> constant
> 129>
>
> Pan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 7:36 PM
> To: Li, Pan2
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@g
10, 2024 7:36 PM
To: Li, Pan2
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com;
tamar.christ...@arm.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com; rdapp@gmail.com; Liu,
Hongtao
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Vect: Promote unsigned .SAT_ADD constant operand for
vectorizable_call
On Wed, Ju
, 2024 7:36 PM
To: Li, Pan2
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com;
tamar.christ...@arm.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com; rdapp@gmail.com; Liu,
Hongtao
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Vect: Promote unsigned .SAT_ADD constant operand for
vectorizable_call
On Wed, Jul 10,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:28 AM wrote:
>
> From: Pan Li
>
> The .SAT_ADD has 2 operand and one of the operand may be INTEGER_CST.
> For example _1 = .SAT_ADD (_2, 9) comes from below sample code.
>
> Form 3:
> #define DEF_VEC_SAT_U_ADD_IMM_FMT_3(T, IMM) \
> T __attri
From: Pan Li
The .SAT_ADD has 2 operand and one of the operand may be INTEGER_CST.
For example _1 = .SAT_ADD (_2, 9) comes from below sample code.
Form 3:
#define DEF_VEC_SAT_U_ADD_IMM_FMT_3(T, IMM) \
T __attribute__((noinline))
20 matches
Mail list logo
