From: Pan Li <pan2...@intel.com>
The .SAT_ADD has 2 operand and one of the operand may be INTEGER_CST.
For example _1 = .SAT_ADD (_2, 9) comes from below sample code.
Form 3:
#define DEF_VEC_SAT_U_ADD_IMM_FMT_3(T, IMM) \
T __attribute__((noinline)) \
vec_sat_u_add_imm##IMM##_##T##_fmt_3 (T *out, T *in, unsigned limit) \
{ \
unsigned i; \
T ret; \
for (i = 0; i < limit; i++) \
{ \
out[i] = __builtin_add_overflow (in[i], IMM, &ret) ? -1 : ret; \
} \
}
DEF_VEC_SAT_U_ADD_IMM_FMT_3(uint64_t, 9)
It will failure to vectorize as the vectorizable_call will check the
operands is type_compatiable but the imm will be treated as unsigned
SImode from the perspective of tree. Aka
uint64_t _1;
uint64_t _2;
_1 = .SAT_ADD (_2, 9);
The _1 and _2 are unsigned DImode, which is different to imm 9 unsigned
SImode, and then result in vectorizable_call fails. This patch would
like to promote the imm operand to the operand type mode of _2 if and
only if there is no precision/data loss. Aka convert the imm 9 to the
DImode for above example.
The below test suites are passed for this patch:
1. The rv64gcv fully regression tests.
2. The rv64gcv build with glibc.
3. The x86 bootstrap tests.
4. The x86 fully regression tests.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-vect-patterns.cc (vect_recog_promote_cst_to_unsigned): Add
new func impl to promote the imm tree to target type.
(vect_recog_sat_add_pattern): Peform the type promotion before
generate .SAT_ADD call.
Signed-off-by: Pan Li <pan2...@intel.com>
---
gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
index 86e893a1c43..e1013222b12 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
@@ -4527,6 +4527,20 @@ vect_recog_build_binary_gimple_stmt (vec_info *vinfo,
stmt_vec_info stmt_info,
return NULL;
}
+static void
+vect_recog_promote_cst_to_unsigned (tree *op, tree type)
+{
+ if (TREE_CODE (*op) != INTEGER_CST || !TYPE_UNSIGNED (type))
+ return;
+
+ unsigned precision = TYPE_PRECISION (type);
+ wide_int type_max = wi::mask (precision, false, precision);
+ wide_int op_cst_val = wi::to_wide (*op, precision);
+
+ if (wi::leu_p (op_cst_val, type_max))
+ *op = wide_int_to_tree (type, op_cst_val);
+}
+
/*
* Try to detect saturation add pattern (SAT_ADD), aka below gimple:
* _7 = _4 + _6;
@@ -4553,6 +4567,9 @@ vect_recog_sat_add_pattern (vec_info *vinfo,
stmt_vec_info stmt_vinfo,
if (gimple_unsigned_integer_sat_add (lhs, ops, NULL))
{
+ vect_recog_promote_cst_to_unsigned (&ops[0], TREE_TYPE (ops[1]));
+ vect_recog_promote_cst_to_unsigned (&ops[1], TREE_TYPE (ops[0]));
+
gimple *stmt = vect_recog_build_binary_gimple_stmt (vinfo, stmt_vinfo,
IFN_SAT_ADD, type_out,
lhs, ops[0], ops[1]);
--
2.34.1
