> On 7/12/22 08:13, Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>
>> The kernel bpftool expects BTF_KIND_FUNC entries in BTF to include an
>> annotation reflecting the linkage of functions (static, global). For
>> whatever reason they abuse the `vlen' field of the BTF_KIND_FUNC entry
>> instead of
On 7/12/22 08:13, Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> The kernel bpftool expects BTF_KIND_FUNC entries in BTF to include an
> annotation reflecting the linkage of functions (static, global). For
> whatever reason they abuse the `vlen' field of the BTF_KIND_FUNC entry
> instead of addin
On 7/12/22 8:13 AM, Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches wrote:
The kernel bpftool expects BTF_KIND_FUNC entries in BTF to include an
annotation reflecting the linkage of functions (static, global). For
whatever reason they abuse the `vlen' field of the BTF_KIND_FUNC entry
instead of adding a varia
The kernel bpftool expects BTF_KIND_FUNC entries in BTF to include an
annotation reflecting the linkage of functions (static, global). For
whatever reason they abuse the `vlen' field of the BTF_KIND_FUNC entry
instead of adding a variable-part to the record like it is done with
other entry kinds
