On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 07:29:26PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On 17 Oct 17:18, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 07:17:31PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > > On 17 Oct 17:10, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > Well, there is no need to remove them, just the " || (f &&
> > > > !omp_is_initi
On 17 Oct 17:18, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 07:17:31PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > On 17 Oct 17:10, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > Well, there is no need to remove them, just the " || (f &&
> > > !omp_is_initial_device ())"
> > > should be dropped from target regions without devi
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 07:17:31PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On 17 Oct 17:10, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 06:58:17PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > > Here in the original test you have:
> > >
> > > #pragma omp target if (v <= 1)
> > > if (omp_get_level () != 0 || (f && !o
On 17 Oct 17:10, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 06:58:17PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > Here in the original test you have:
> >
> > #pragma omp target if (v <= 1)
> > if (omp_get_level () != 0 || (f && !omp_is_initial_device ()))
> > abort ();
> > #pragma omp target devi
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 06:58:17PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> Here in the original test you have:
>
> #pragma omp target if (v <= 1)
> if (omp_get_level () != 0 || (f && !omp_is_initial_device ()))
> abort ();
> #pragma omp target device (d) if (v <= 1)
> if (omp_get_level () != 0 ||
On 17 Oct 16:14, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > -volatile int v;
> > +volatile int v = 0;
>
> Why?
Ok, I'll revert it back.
> > --- a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/target-7.c
> > +++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/target-7.c
> > @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
> > +// { dg-require-effective-target offload_device }
> > +
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 06:02:11PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/examples-4/e.53.2.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> +// { dg-do run }
> +// { dg-require-effective-target offload_device }
Well, this test actually relies not only offload_device,
but also on no
On 15 Oct 17:35, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> But we do want to test them with host fallback, which those lines preclude.
> Just a single dg-require-effective-target offload_device guarded test (which
> there necessarily is, e.g. the 57.* ones) should be sufficient for your
> purposes (if you want to dif
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 07:28:37PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On 15 Oct 17:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > This patch adds all examples with '#pragma omp target' from [1] to libgomp
> > > testsuite. Without an accelerator or emulator, these tests are
> > > UNSUPPORTED.
> >
> > Why? Most of the
On 15 Oct 17:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > This patch adds all examples with '#pragma omp target' from [1] to libgomp
> > testsuite. Without an accelerator or emulator, these tests are UNSUPPORTED.
>
> Why? Most of the tests should work just fine with host fallback.
> Yeah, from Examples 4.0.1 I'
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 06:57:52PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch adds all examples with '#pragma omp target' from [1] to libgomp
> testsuite. Without an accelerator or emulator, these tests are UNSUPPORTED.
Why? Most of the tests should work just fine with host fallback.
Yea
Hello,
This patch adds all examples with '#pragma omp target' from [1] to libgomp
testsuite. Without an accelerator or emulator, these tests are UNSUPPORTED.
Bootstrapped and regtested on i686-linux and x86_64-linux. Is it OK for trunk?
[1] http://openmp.org/mp-documents/OpenMP_Examples_4.0.1.p
12 matches
Mail list logo
