On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 06:51:10AM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> sorry, in the patch I should use targetm.have_atomic instead of
> TARGET_HAVE_LIBATOMIC.
I've noticed the r14-5579 commit introduced some formatting issues,
this patch fixes what I saw.
In particular, operators don't go at the e
Hello,
sorry, in the patch I should use targetm.have_atomic instead of
TARGET_HAVE_LIBATOMIC.
---
embedded brains GmbH & Co. KG
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
The code coverage support uses counters to determine which edges in the control
flow graph were executed. If a counter overflows, then the code coverage
information is invalid. Therefore the counter type should be a 64-bit integer.
In multi-threaded applications, it is important that the counter
