On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 06:51:10AM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> sorry, in the patch I should use targetm.have_atomic instead of 
> TARGET_HAVE_LIBATOMIC. 

I've noticed the r14-5579 commit introduced some formatting issues,
this patch fixes what I saw.

In particular, operators don't go at the end of line but at the start of
next one.

Committed to trunk as obvious.

2023-11-21  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

gcc/
        * tree-profile.cc (gen_counter_update, tree_profiling): Formatting
        fixes.
libgcc/
        * libgcov.h (GCOV_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC): Formatting fixes.

--- gcc/tree-profile.cc.jj      2023-11-21 09:31:36.349387476 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-profile.cc 2023-11-21 10:45:26.035499140 +0100
@@ -304,8 +304,8 @@ gen_counter_update (gimple_stmt_iterator
   tree one = build_int_cst (type, 1);
   tree relaxed = build_int_cst (integer_type_node, MEMMODEL_RELAXED);
 
-  if (counter_update == COUNTER_UPDATE_ATOMIC_BUILTIN ||
-      (result && counter_update == COUNTER_UPDATE_ATOMIC_SPLIT))
+  if (counter_update == COUNTER_UPDATE_ATOMIC_BUILTIN
+      || (result && counter_update == COUNTER_UPDATE_ATOMIC_SPLIT))
     {
       /* __atomic_fetch_add (&counter, 1, MEMMODEL_RELAXED); */
       tree f = builtin_decl_explicit (TYPE_PRECISION (type) > 32
@@ -314,8 +314,8 @@ gen_counter_update (gimple_stmt_iterator
       gcall *call = gimple_build_call (f, 3, addr, one, relaxed);
       gen_assign_counter_update (gsi, call, f, result, name);
     }
-  else if (!result && (counter_update == COUNTER_UPDATE_ATOMIC_SPLIT ||
-                      counter_update == COUNTER_UPDATE_ATOMIC_PARTIAL))
+  else if (!result && (counter_update == COUNTER_UPDATE_ATOMIC_SPLIT
+                      || counter_update == COUNTER_UPDATE_ATOMIC_PARTIAL))
     {
       /* low = __atomic_add_fetch_4 (addr, 1, MEMMODEL_RELAXED);
         high_inc = low == 0 ? 1 : 0;
@@ -780,8 +780,8 @@ tree_profiling (void)
       flag_profile_update = PROFILE_UPDATE_SINGLE;
     }
   else if (flag_profile_update == PROFILE_UPDATE_PREFER_ATOMIC)
-    flag_profile_update = can_support_atomic
-      ? PROFILE_UPDATE_ATOMIC : PROFILE_UPDATE_SINGLE;
+    flag_profile_update
+      = can_support_atomic ? PROFILE_UPDATE_ATOMIC : PROFILE_UPDATE_SINGLE;
 
   if (flag_profile_update == PROFILE_UPDATE_ATOMIC)
     {
@@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ tree_profiling (void)
        counter_update = COUNTER_UPDATE_ATOMIC_BUILTIN;
     }
   else if (gcov_type_size == 8 && have_atomic_4)
-      counter_update = COUNTER_UPDATE_ATOMIC_PARTIAL;
+    counter_update = COUNTER_UPDATE_ATOMIC_PARTIAL;
 
   /* This is a small-ipa pass that gets called only once, from
      cgraphunit.cc:ipa_passes().  */
--- libgcc/libgcov.h.jj 2023-11-20 09:50:08.434204617 +0100
+++ libgcc/libgcov.h    2023-11-21 10:47:50.320481543 +0100
@@ -96,9 +96,9 @@ typedef unsigned gcov_type_unsigned __at
 #endif
 
 /* Detect whether target can support atomic update of profilers.  */
-#if (__SIZEOF_LONG_LONG__ == 4 && __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_4) || \
-    (__SIZEOF_LONG_LONG__ == 8 && __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_8) || \
-    defined (__LIBGCC_HAVE_LIBATOMIC)
+#if (__SIZEOF_LONG_LONG__ == 4 && __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_4) \
+    || (__SIZEOF_LONG_LONG__ == 8 && __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_8) \
+    || defined (__LIBGCC_HAVE_LIBATOMIC)
 #define GCOV_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC 1
 #else
 #define GCOV_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC 0

        Jakub

Reply via email to