Hi!
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:40:01 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> This patch allows to run non-fallback 'make check-target-libgomp'. It passes
> to
> the host compiler additional -B options with the paths to the offload
> compilers,
> since non-installed host compiler doesn't know where to find mko
On 28 Jan 19:20, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On 28 Jan 17:15, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 07:02:59PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > > + = XNEWVEC (char, len + sizeof ("-B" "../" DEFAULT_TARGET_MACHINE
> > > +"/libgomp/"));
> > > + sprintf (optional_
On 28 Jan 17:15, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 07:02:59PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > + = XNEWVEC (char, len + sizeof ("-B" "../" DEFAULT_TARGET_MACHINE
> > + "/libgomp/"));
> > + sprintf (optional_target_path2, "-B%s/../../../"
> > DEFAUL
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 07:02:59PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> + = XNEWVEC (char, len + sizeof ("-B" "../" DEFAULT_TARGET_MACHINE
> +"/libgomp/"));
> + sprintf (optional_target_path2, "-B%s/../../../" DEFAULT_TARGET_MACHINE
> +
On 15 Jan 19:58, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:55:40PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > This patch enables 'make check-target-libgomp' with noninstalled offloading
> > compilers. It creates gcc/accel// directory in the build tree of
> > the
> > offloading compiler, this allows lt
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:55:40PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> This patch enables 'make check-target-libgomp' with noninstalled offloading
> compilers. It creates gcc/accel// directory in the build tree of the
> offloading compiler, this allows lto-wrapper to find corresponding mkoffload
> in
> c
On 22 Dec 13:35, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:48:08PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > In my understanding, we'd like to support the modes that either all
> > compilers are installed (which is what a user will be using), or all are
> > tested from their build trees. Or, do we
Hi!
On Fri, 26 Dec 2014 22:15:24 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On 22 Dec 12:48, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Here is a patch to correctly match intelmic in $offload_targets; OK to
> > commit, I assume? I suppose I'm the first one to ever do build-tree
> > testing? (Jakub?)
> OK, thanks.
> I verifi
On 22 Dec 12:48, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> What is the reason for adding paths if $tgt_dir is empty? (I mean, if
> properly installed and $tgt_dir empty, this should just work, because
> that's what a user will be doing, so why does the libgomp testsuite have
> to do differently?)
The case for emp
Hi!
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:21:20 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:48:01PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > I have another suggestion: on gomp-4_0-branch, we had already started
> > using a libgomp-test-support.exp file for a similar purpose. I now
> > changed your code o
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:48:08PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> In my understanding, we'd like to support the modes that either all
> compilers are installed (which is what a user will be using), or all are
> tested from their build trees. Or, do we also have to support the mode
> that only the
Hi!
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:41:18 +0100, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> 2014-12-18 16:27 GMT+01:00 Thomas Schwinge :
> > On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:40:01 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> >> This patch allows to run non-fallback 'make check-target-libgomp'. It
> >> passes to
> >> the host compiler additional -B op
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 06:41:18PM +0100, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > What we're doing in OpenACC offloading testing (gomp-4_0-branch), is in
> > the libgomp.oacc-c/c.exp (etc.) file cycle through all the available
> > offloading devices, and then in there -- I think -- such options should
> > be set, t
Hi,
2014-12-18 16:27 GMT+01:00 Thomas Schwinge :
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:40:01 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
>> This patch allows to run non-fallback 'make check-target-libgomp'. It
>> passes to
>> the host compiler additional -B options with the paths to the offload
>> compilers,
>> sinc
Hi!
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:40:01 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> This patch allows to run non-fallback 'make check-target-libgomp'. It passes
> to
> the host compiler additional -B options with the paths to the offload
> compilers,
> since non-installed host compiler doesn't know where to find mko
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:48:01PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> I have another suggestion: on gomp-4_0-branch, we had already started
> using a libgomp-test-support.exp file for a similar purpose. I now
> changed your code on gomp-4_0-branch in r218845 as follows (though, not
> very much tested
Hi!
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:34:30 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On 06 Nov 18:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Looks mostly good, but:
> >
> > > +# We need more things in site.exp, but automake completely controls the
> > > +# creation of that file; there's no way to append to it without messing
> > >
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:14:21PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 21:44:40, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > > You're right. This patch was rebased so many times, that we may forget to
> > > regenerate it before committing.
>
> Build with liboffloadmic passed. OK for trunk?
>
> -- Ily
Hi Jakub!
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 21:44:40, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > You're right. This patch was rebased so many times, that we may forget to
> > regenerate it before committing.
Build with liboffloadmic passed. OK for trunk?
-- Ilya
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
diff --git a/Makefile.i
Hi Ilya,
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 21:44:40, Ilya Verbin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 21 Nov 19:19, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> so, did you really regenerate Makefile.in in that patch, or am I missing
>> something ?
>
> You're right. This patch was rebased so many times, that we may forget to
> regenerate it bef
Hi,
On 21 Nov 19:19, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> so, did you really regenerate Makefile.in in that patch, or am I missing
> something ?
You're right. This patch was rebased so many times, that we may forget to
regenerate it before committing.
Do you plan to submit any patch for Makefile.in?
Or sho
Aehm Kirill,
excuse me please, but if I do
autogen Makefile.def
I get this from svn diff
Index: Makefile.in
===
--- Makefile.in (revision 217890)
+++ Makefile.in (working copy)
@@ -35238,9 +35238,6 @@
$(SHELL) $(srcdir)
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:34:30PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > I don't like this, that is too fragile. If automake is changed, we'll
> > forget to update this.
> > If all you are about are the 3 additional variables, can't you instead
> > put them into env vars and query them in the tcl code usi
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:34:30PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> Done, I put them into env vars.
>
> > > +lappend ALWAYS_CFLAGS
> > > "additional_flags=${offload_additional_options}"
> > > }
> >
> > Perhaps add this only if offload_additional_options is non-empty?
>
> Done.
Ok (with appropr
On 06 Nov 18:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Looks mostly good, but:
>
> > +# We need more things in site.exp, but automake completely controls the
> > +# creation of that file; there's no way to append to it without messing up
> > +# the dependancy chains. So we overrule automake. This rule is exact
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 02:40:01PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> 2014-10-30 Andrey Turetskiy
> Ilya Verbin
>
> libgomp/
> * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
> * configure: Regenerate.
> * configure.ac: Set up offload_additional_options,
> offload_additional_lib_paths a
Hello,
This patch allows to run non-fallback 'make check-target-libgomp'. It passes to
the host compiler additional -B options with the paths to the offload compilers,
since non-installed host compiler doesn't know where to find mkoffload tools.
Also in case of intelmic offload targets it appends
27 matches
Mail list logo
