On 02/15/16 04:53, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:55:40PM -0600, Evandro Menezes wrote:
Got it.
Let me try this again:
Add support for the FCCMP insn types
2016-01-21 Evandro Menezes
gcc/
* config/aarch64/aarch64.md (fccmp): Change insn type.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:55:40PM -0600, Evandro Menezes wrote:
>
> Got it.
>
> Let me try this again:
>
>Add support for the FCCMP insn types
>
>2016-01-21 Evandro Menezes
>
>gcc/
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (fccmp): Change insn type.
> (fccmpe): Like
On 01/21/16 16:55, Evandro Menezes wrote:
On 01/21/16 16:07, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:58:31PM -0600, Evandro Menezes wrote:
Hi, James.
On 01/21/16 03:24, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:44:47PM -0600, Evandro Menezes wrote:
On 01/06/2016 06:04 AM,
On 01/21/16 16:07, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:58:31PM -0600, Evandro Menezes wrote:
Hi, James.
On 01/21/16 03:24, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:44:47PM -0600, Evandro Menezes wrote:
On 01/06/2016 06:04 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Here's what I had i
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:58:31PM -0600, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> Hi, James.
>
> On 01/21/16 03:24, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:44:47PM -0600, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> >>On 01/06/2016 06:04 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> Here's what I had in mind when I inquired about d
On 01/21/16 13:58, Evandro Menezes wrote:
Hi, James.
On 01/21/16 03:24, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:44:47PM -0600, Evandro Menezes wrote:
On 01/06/2016 06:04 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Here's what I had in mind when I inquired about distinguishing
FCMP from
FCCMP. As y
Hi, James.
On 01/21/16 03:24, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:44:47PM -0600, Evandro Menezes wrote:
On 01/06/2016 06:04 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Here's what I had in mind when I inquired about distinguishing FCMP from
FCCMP. As you can see in the patch, Exynos is the only
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:13:29AM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > If we don't have any targets which care about the fccmps/fccmpd split in
> > the code base, do we really need it? Can we just follow the example of
> > fcsel?
>
> If we do that then we should also change
James Greenhalgh wrote:
> If we don't have any targets which care about the fccmps/fccmpd split in
> the code base, do we really need it? Can we just follow the example of
> fcsel?
If we do that then we should also change fcmps/d to fcmp to keep the f(c)cmp
attributes orthogonal. However it seems
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:44:47PM -0600, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> Hi, Wilco.
>
> On 01/06/2016 06:04 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> >>Here's what I had in mind when I inquired about distinguishing FCMP from
> >>FCCMP. As you can see in the patch, Exynos is the only target that
> >>cares about it, b
On 01/06/16 14:44, Evandro Menezes wrote:
Hi, Wilco.
On 01/06/2016 06:04 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Here's what I had in mind when I inquired about distinguishing FCMP
from
FCCMP. As you can see in the patch, Exynos is the only target that
cares about it, but I wonder if ThunderX or Xgene woul
Hi, Wilco.
On 01/06/2016 06:04 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Here's what I had in mind when I inquired about distinguishing FCMP from
FCCMP. As you can see in the patch, Exynos is the only target that
cares about it, but I wonder if ThunderX or Xgene would too.
What do you think?
The new attribut
Hi Evandro,
> Here's what I had in mind when I inquired about distinguishing FCMP from
> FCCMP. As you can see in the patch, Exynos is the only target that
> cares about it, but I wonder if ThunderX or Xgene would too.
>
> What do you think?
The new attributes look fine (I've got a similar outs
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>>> Subject: [PATCH 2/4 v2][AArch64] Add support for FCCMP
>>>
>>> (v2 version removes 4 enums)
>>>
>>> This patch adds support for FCCMP. This is trivial with the new CCMP
>>> representation - remove the restricti
Hi, Wilco.
On 12/15/2015 04:32 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Wilco Dijkstra [mailto:wilco.dijks...@arm.com]
Sent: 17 November 2015 18:36
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4 v2][AArch64] Add support for FCCMP
(v2 version removes 4 enums)
This patch adds
On 12/15/2015 06:20 PM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Adding Bernd - would you mind reviewing the ccmp.c change please?
Oh sorry, didn't realize there was one in here as well. Looks ok.
Bernd
Adding Bernd - would you mind reviewing the ccmp.c change please?
> -Original Message-
> From: James Greenhalgh [mailto:james.greenha...@arm.com]
> Sent: 15 December 2015 16:42
> To: Wilco Dijkstra
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 v2][AArch64] Add
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:32:50AM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> ping
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wilco Dijkstra [mailto:wilco.dijks...@arm.com]
> > Sent: 17 November 2015 18:36
> > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/4 v2][AArch64
ping
> -Original Message-
> From: Wilco Dijkstra [mailto:wilco.dijks...@arm.com]
> Sent: 17 November 2015 18:36
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH 2/4 v2][AArch64] Add support for FCCMP
>
> (v2 version removes 4 enums)
>
> This patch adds support
(v2 version removes 4 enums)
This patch adds support for FCCMP. This is trivial with the new CCMP
representation - remove the restriction of FP in ccmp.c and add FCCMP
patterns. Add a test to ensure FCCMP/FCCMPE are emitted as expected.
OK for commit?
ChangeLog:
2015-11-18 Wilco Dijkstra
20 matches
Mail list logo
