On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 15:50:53 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 03:41:40PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Well, but users (like Jakub, for example) ;-) may decide to build the
> > offloading compilers without specifying --enable-languages, and that'll
> > then default to i
Hi Thomas,
On 20 Feb 2015, at 19:46, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:35:18 -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Feb 20, 2015, at 6:36 AM, Ilya Verbin wrote:
>>> I assumed that nobody would build an offloading compiler with
>>> --enable-languages
>>> other than c,c++,fortran[,lto].
>>
Hi!
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:35:18 -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2015, at 6:36 AM, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > I assumed that nobody would build an offloading compiler with
> > --enable-languages
> > other than c,c++,fortran[,lto].
>
> :-) You should try objc and obj-c++… With some luck, th
On Feb 20, 2015, at 6:36 AM, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> I assumed that nobody would build an offloading compiler with
> --enable-languages
> other than c,c++,fortran[,lto].
:-) You should try objc and obj-c++… With some luck, they might just work out
of the box.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 03:41:40PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Well, but users (like Jakub, for example) ;-) may decide to build the
> offloading compilers without specifying --enable-languages, and that'll
> then default to include Java, and you'll end up with:
Yeah. We can perhaps tweak wha
Hi!
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:36:12 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:37:10 +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:36:21 +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > > gcc/
> > > * Makefile.in
> >
> > > (install-cpp, install-common, install_driver, install-gcc-ar): Do n
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:37:10 +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:36:21 +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > gcc/
> > * Makefile.in
>
> > (install-cpp, install-common, install_driver, install-gcc-ar): Do not
> > install for the offload compiler.
>
> > gcc/cp/
> > *
Hi!
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:36:21 +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> The patch has been updated:
> if a compiler is configured as accelerator,
> it installs *-accel-*-g++, and other drivers. But only *-accel-*-gcc is
> needed.
> Therefore I suppressed their installation in corresponding Makefiles.
>
Hi,
On 12 Dec 09:17, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:14:28AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:16:37 +0200, I wrote:
> > > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:36:21 +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > > > --- a/configure.ac
> > > > +++ b/configure.ac
> > > > @@ -286,6 +286,24
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:14:28AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:16:37 +0200, I wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:36:21 +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > > --- a/configure.ac
> > > +++ b/configure.ac
> > > @@ -286,6 +286,24 @@ case ${with_newlib} in
> > >yes) skipdirs=`ech
Hi!
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:16:37 +0200, I wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:36:21 +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > --- a/configure.ac
> > +++ b/configure.ac
> > @@ -286,6 +286,24 @@ case ${with_newlib} in
> >yes) skipdirs=`echo " ${skipdirs} " | sed -e 's/ target-newlib / /'` ;;
> > esac
> >
>
On 26 Sep 22:02, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Any patch adding new configure options needs to add documentation of the
> semantics of those options in install.texi. I see no such documentation
> in this patch.
Done.
On 30 Sep 13:16, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Doesn't that comment belong to real_targ
Hi!
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:36:21 +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> --- a/gcc/Makefile.in
> +++ b/gcc/Makefile.in
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ build=@build@
> host=@host@
> target=@target@
> target_noncanonical:=@target_noncanonical@
> +real_target_noncanonical:=@real_target_noncanonical@
>
> # Sed command
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 04:36:21PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> 2014-09-26 Bernd Schmidt
> Thomas Schwinge
> Ilya Verbin
> Andrey Turetskiy
>
> * configure: Regenerate.
> * configure.ac (--enable-as-accelerator-for)
> (--enable-offload-target
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> 2014-09-26 Bernd Schmidt
> Thomas Schwinge
> Ilya Verbin
> Andrey Turetskiy
>
> * configure: Regenerate.
> * configure.ac (--enable-as-accelerator-for)
> (--enable-offload-targets): New configure op
Hi,
The patch has been updated:
On 17 Sep 15:45, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Looks mostly ok, just some nits. But see the patch I've just posted,
> perhaps we want to tweak the --enable-offload-targets arguments. And
Now the targets in --enable-offload-targets can have optional path to the build
or
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:52:27PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> This patch contains necessary changes for the build system to support
> offloading.
> It adds 2 new options for configure:
> * --enable-as-accelerator-for=ARG is intended for the offload target compiler.
> * --enable-offload-targets=LI
Hello,
This patch contains necessary changes for the build system to support
offloading.
It adds 2 new options for configure:
* --enable-as-accelerator-for=ARG is intended for the offload target compiler.
* --enable-offload-targets=LIST is intended for the offload host compiler.
Some more info:
On 11 Sep 13:34, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I think it is not useful to split patches on in which sequence they were
> added to the tree. I'd prefer patches for functional parts for the
> differences between trunk and corresponding offloading branch.
> So, one patch should be all the libgomp changes e
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 03:28:02PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> I would like to start merging offloading-related patches from gomp-4_0-branch
> to trunk.
> This is the first patch (from r202620), which adds a splay tree and memory
> mapping to libgomp.
> I removed temporarily device 257 from it.
Hello,
I would like to start merging offloading-related patches from gomp-4_0-branch
to trunk.
This is the first patch (from r202620), which adds a splay tree and memory
mapping to libgomp.
I removed temporarily device 257 from it. Bootstrapped and regtested on
x86_64-linux.
2014-09-11 Jakub
21 matches
Mail list logo
