Re: [PATCH 0/6] RISC-V: frm state-machine improvements

On 5/10/25 06:49, Jeff Law wrote: > On 5/9/25 2:27 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This came out of Rivos perf team reporting (shoutout to Siavash) that >> some of the SPEC2017 workloads had unnecessary FRM wiggles, when >> none were needed. The writes in particular could be expensive. >> >> I

Re: [PATCH 0/6] RISC-V: frm state-machine improvements

On 5/9/25 2:27 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote: Hi, This came out of Rivos perf team reporting (shoutout to Siavash) that some of the SPEC2017 workloads had unnecessary FRM wiggles, when none were needed. The writes in particular could be expensive. I started with reduced test for PR/119164 from blen

[PATCH 0/6] RISC-V: frm state-machine improvements

Hi, This came out of Rivos perf team reporting (shoutout to Siavash) that some of the SPEC2017 workloads had unnecessary FRM wiggles, when none were needed. The writes in particular could be expensive. I started with reduced test for PR/119164 from blender:node_testure_util.c. However in trying