> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 12:50 PM
> To: Tamar Christina
> Cc: Richard Sandiford ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
> nd
> Subject: RE: [PATCH]middle-end: Fix incorrect codegen with PFA and VLS
> [PR119351]
>
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 12:49 PM
> To: Tamar Christina
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd
> Subject: Re: [PATCH]middle-end: Fix incorrect codegen with PFA and VLS
> [PR119351]
>
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025, Tamar
t; > > > To: Tamar Christina
> > > > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; rguent...@suse.de
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH]middle-end: Fix incorrect codegen with PFA and VLS
> > > > [PR119351]
> > > >
> > > > Tamar Christina writes:
&
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025, Tamar Christina wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The following example:
>
> #define N 512
> #define START 2
> #define END 505
>
> int x[N] __attribute__((aligned(32)));
>
> int __attribute__((noipa))
> foo (void)
> {
> for (signed int i = START; i < END; ++i)
> {
> if (x[i
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025, Tamar Christina wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard Sandiford
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 10:52 AM
> > To: Tamar Christina
> > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; rguent...@suse.de
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH]middle
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 10:52 AM
> To: Tamar Christina
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; rguent...@suse.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH]middle-end: Fix incorrect codegen with PFA and VLS
> [PR119351]
>
> Tamar
Tamar Christina writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc
> index
> 56a4e9a8b63f3cae0bf596bf5d22893887dc80e8..0722679d6e66e5dd5af4ec1ce591f7c38b76d07f
> 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc
> @@ -2195,6 +2195,22 @@
Hi All,
The following example:
#define N 512
#define START 2
#define END 505
int x[N] __attribute__((aligned(32)));
int __attribute__((noipa))
foo (void)
{
for (signed int i = START; i < END; ++i)
{
if (x[i] == 0)
return i;
}
return -1;
}
generates incorrect code with
