> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 12:50 PM
> To: Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
> Cc: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
> nd <n...@arm.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH]middle-end: Fix incorrect codegen with PFA and VLS
> [PR119351]
>
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025, Tamar Christina wrote:
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 10:52 AM
> > > To: Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
> > > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd <n...@arm.com>; rguent...@suse.de
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH]middle-end: Fix incorrect codegen with PFA and VLS
> > > [PR119351]
> > >
> > > Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com> writes:
> > > > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc
> > > > index
> > >
> 56a4e9a8b63f3cae0bf596bf5d22893887dc80e8..0722679d6e66e5dd5af4ec1c
> > > e591f7c38b76d07f 100644
> > > > --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc
> > > > +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc
> > > > @@ -2195,6 +2195,22 @@ vect_can_peel_nonlinear_iv_p (loop_vec_info
> > > loop_vinfo,
> > > > return false;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + /* With early break vectorization we don't know whether the accesses
> > > > will
> stay
> > > > + inside the loop or not. TODO: The early break adjustment code
> > > > can be
> > > > + implemented the same way for vectorizable_linear_induction.
> > > > However
> we
> > > > + can't test this today so reject it. */
> > > > + if (niters_skip != NULL_TREE
> > > > + && vect_use_loop_mask_for_alignment_p (loop_vinfo)
> > > > + && LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_ALIGNMENT (loop_vinfo)
> > > > + && LOOP_VINFO_EARLY_BREAKS (loop_vinfo))
> > > > + {
> > > > + if (dump_enabled_p ())
> > > > + dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
> > > > + "Peeling for alignement using masking is not
> > > > supported"
> > > > + " for nonlinear induction when using early
> > > > breaks.\n");
> > > > + return false;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > return true;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > FTR, I was wondering here whether we should predict this in advance and
> > > instead drop down to peeling for alignment without masks. It probably
> > > isn't worth the effort though.
> >
> > We could move the check into vect_use_loop_mask_for_alignment_p where
> > rejecting it there would get it to fall back to scalar peeling. That seems
> > simple
> enough
> > if that's preferrable.
>
> The above is perferable IMO (short of fixing up that case, but with
> a testcase).
>
I wasn't able to make a testcase before as any non-linear induction feeding a
load becomes
a gather load, which we block outright way before getting here though. I
couldn't think of
an example where it wouldn't be, even a gapped load e.g +=2 became one.
Thanks,
Tamar
> Richard.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Tamar
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> > > > index
> > >
> 9413dcef702597ab27165e676546b190e2bd36ba..6dcdee19bb250993d8cc6b0
> > > 057d2fa46245d04d9 100644
> > > > --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> > > > +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> > > > @@ -10678,6 +10678,104 @@ vectorizable_induction (loop_vec_info
> > > loop_vinfo,
> > > > LOOP_VINFO_MASK_SKIP_NITERS
> > > (loop_vinfo));
> > > > peel_mul = gimple_build_vector_from_val (&init_stmts,
> > > > step_vectype,
> > > > peel_mul);
> > > > +
> > > > + /* If early break then we have to create a new PHI which we
> > > > can use as
> > > > + an offset to adjust the induction reduction in early exits.
> > > > */
> > > > + if (LOOP_VINFO_EARLY_BREAKS (loop_vinfo))
> > > > + {
> > > > + auto skip_niters = LOOP_VINFO_MASK_SKIP_NITERS
> > > > (loop_vinfo);
> > > > + tree ty_skip_niters = TREE_TYPE (skip_niters);
> > > > + tree break_lhs_phi = NULL_TREE;
> > > > + break_lhs_phi = vect_get_new_vect_var (ty_skip_niters,
> > > > + vect_scalar_var,
> > > > + "pfa_iv_offset");
> > > > + gphi *nphi = create_phi_node (break_lhs_phi, bb);
> > > > + add_phi_arg (nphi, skip_niters, pe, UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
> > > > + add_phi_arg (nphi, build_zero_cst (ty_skip_niters),
> > > > + loop_latch_edge (iv_loop), UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Rewrite all the early exit usages. */
> > > > + tree phi_lhs = PHI_RESULT (phi);
> > > > + imm_use_iterator iter;
> > > > + use_operand_p use_p;
> > > > + gimple *use_stmt;
> > > > +
> > > > + FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_FAST (use_p, iter, phi_lhs)
> > > > + {
> > > > + use_stmt = USE_STMT (use_p);
> > > > + if (!flow_bb_inside_loop_p (iv_loop, gimple_bb
> > > > (use_stmt))
> > > > + && is_a <gphi *> (use_stmt))
> > > > + {
> > > > + auto gsi = gsi_last_bb (use_stmt->bb);
> > > > + for (auto exit : get_loop_exit_edges (iv_loop))
> > > > + if (exit != LOOP_VINFO_IV_EXIT (loop_vinfo)
> > > > + && bb == exit->src)
> > > > + {
> > > > + /* Now create the PHI for the outside loop
> > > > usage to
> > > > + retrieve the value for the offset
> > > > counter. */
> > > > + tree rphi_lhs = make_ssa_name
> > > > (ty_skip_niters);
> > > > + gphi *rphi
> > > > + = create_phi_node (rphi_lhs,
> > > > use_stmt->bb);
> > > > + for (unsigned i = 0; i <
> > > > gimple_phi_num_args (rphi);
> > > > + i++)
> > > > + SET_PHI_ARG_DEF (rphi, i, PHI_RESULT
> > > > (nphi));
> > > > +
> > > > + tree tmp = make_ssa_name (TREE_TYPE
> > > > (phi_lhs));
> > > > + tree stmt_lhs = PHI_RESULT (use_stmt);
> > > > + imm_use_iterator iter2;
> > > > + gimple *use_stmt2;
> > > > + use_operand_p use2_p;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Now rewrite all the usages first. */
> > > > + FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT (use_stmt2, iter2,
> > > stmt_lhs)
> > > > + FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_ON_STMT (use2_p, iter2)
> > > > + SET_USE (use2_p, tmp);
> > > > +
> > > > + /* And then generate the adjustment to
> > > > avoid the
> > > > + update code from updating this new
> > > > usage. The
> > > > + multiplicaiton is to get the original IV
> > > > and the
> > > > + downwards counting IV correct. */
> > >
> > > typo: multiplication
> > >
> > > But I don't think it's just upcounting vs downcounting. An upcounting iv
> > > with step 2 would also need the multiplication. That is, we're applying
> > > PHI_RESULT (rphi) iv updates, and so need to add the iv step that many
> > > times.
> > >
> > > So IMO it would be clearer to drop the reference specifically to
> > > downcounting
> > > here.
> > >
> > > The patch LGTM with the comment nit fixed, but Richi should have the
> > > final say.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Richard
> > >
> > > > + gimple_seq iv_stmts = NULL;
> > > > + tree rphi_step
> > > > + = gimple_convert (&iv_stmts,
> > > > ty_skip_niters,
> > > > + step_expr);
> > > > + tree tmp2
> > > > + = gimple_build (&iv_stmts, MULT_EXPR,
> > > > + ty_skip_niters, rphi_step,
> > > > + PHI_RESULT (rphi));
> > > > +
> > > > + if (POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (stmt_lhs)))
> > > > + tmp2
> > > > + = gimple_build (&iv_stmts,
> > > > POINTER_PLUS_EXPR,
> > > > + TREE_TYPE (stmt_lhs),
> > > > stmt_lhs,
> > > > + tmp2);
> > > > + else
> > > > + {
> > > > + tmp2
> > > > + = gimple_convert (&iv_stmts,
> > > > + TREE_TYPE
> > > > (stmt_lhs),
> > > > + tmp2);
> > > > + tmp2
> > > > + = gimple_build (&iv_stmts, PLUS_EXPR,
> > > > + TREE_TYPE (stmt_lhs),
> > > > stmt_lhs,
> > > > + tmp2);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + gsi_insert_seq_before (&gsi, iv_stmts,
> > > > + GSI_SAME_STMT);
> > > > + gimple *cvt_stmt =
> > > > + gimple_build_assign (tmp,
> > > > VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR,
> > > > + build1
> > > > (VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR,
> > > > + TREE_TYPE
> > > > (phi_lhs),
> > > > + tmp2));
> > > > + gsi_insert_before (&gsi, cvt_stmt,
> > > > GSI_SAME_STMT);
> > > > + }
> > > > + /* All early exits point to the same common
> > > > block, so we
> > > > + only have to find the first one. */
> > > > + break;
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > }
> > > > tree step_mul = NULL_TREE;
> > > > unsigned ivn;
> >
>
> --
> Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
> Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
> GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)
