Re: [PATCH] x86: Update TARGET_SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES_FOR_MODE_P

2025-04-30 Thread H.J. Lu
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 7:48 PM Uros Bizjak wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 11:40 PM H.J. Lu wrote: > > > > SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES was added by > > > > commit c98f874233428d7e6ba83def7842fd703ac0ddf1 > > Author: James Van Artsdalen > > Date: Sun Feb 9 13:28:48 1992 + > > > > Initial

Re: [PATCH] x86: Update TARGET_SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES_FOR_MODE_P

2025-04-30 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 11:40 PM H.J. Lu wrote: > > SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES was added by > > commit c98f874233428d7e6ba83def7842fd703ac0ddf1 > Author: James Van Artsdalen > Date: Sun Feb 9 13:28:48 1992 + > > Initial revision > > which became TARGET_SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES_FOR_MODE_P. It

[PATCH] x86: Update TARGET_SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES_FOR_MODE_P

2025-04-29 Thread H.J. Lu
SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES was added by commit c98f874233428d7e6ba83def7842fd703ac0ddf1 Author: James Van Artsdalen Date: Sun Feb 9 13:28:48 1992 + Initial revision which became TARGET_SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES_FOR_MODE_P. It is false from day 1 for i386. Since x86-64 doubles the number of