Thanks a lot ! I will send V2 for Richi to review.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Andrew Stubbs
Date: 2023-11-07 20:05
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; gcc-patches
CC: jeffreyalaw; rguenther
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr97428.c for RVV
On 07/11/2023 12:03, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote
esourcery.com>
*Date:* 2023-11-07 19:44
*To:* juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai <mailto:juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>;
gcc-patches <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
*CC:* jeffreyalaw <mailto:jeffreya...@gmail.com>; rguenther
<mailto:rguent...@suse.de>
*Subject:* Re:
SLP" 4 "vect" {
target { vect512 } } } } */
Tested on RVV is OK.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Andrew Stubbs
Date: 2023-11-07 19:44
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; gcc-patches
CC: jeffreyalaw; rguenther
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr97428.c for RVV
On 07/11/2023 11:24, juzhe.zh...@rivai.a
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
*From:* Andrew Stubbs <mailto:a...@codesourcery.com>
*Date:* 2023-11-07 19:21
*To:* juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai <mailto:juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>;
gcc-patches <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
*CC:* jeffreyalaw <m
{
target { ! vect512 } } } } */
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Date: 2023-11-07 19:23
To: ams; gcc-patches
CC: jeffreyalaw; rguenther
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr97428.c for RVV
Do you mean this ?
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times &qu
} } } } */
Could you try again ? If it works for you, I am gonna send V2 patch to Richi.
Thank you so much for help.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Andrew Stubbs
Date: 2023-11-07 19:21
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; gcc-patches
CC: jeffreyalaw; rguenther
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr97428
atches <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
*CC:* jeffreyalaw <mailto:jeffreya...@gmail.com>; rguenther
<mailto:rguent...@suse.de>
*Subject:* Re: [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr97428.c for RVV
On 07/11/2023 10:10, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> So, this patch not only f
} } } */
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Andrew Stubbs
Date: 2023-11-07 18:59
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; gcc-patches
CC: jeffreyalaw; rguenther
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr97428.c for RVV
On 07/11/2023 10:10, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> So, this patch not only fixes RVV FAIL, but
<mailto:juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>;
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
*CC:* jeffreya...@gmail.com <mailto:jeffreya...@gmail.com>;
rguent...@suse.de <mailto:rguent...@suse.de>
*Subject:* Re: [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr97428.c for RVV
On 07/11/2
So, this patch not only fixes RVV FAIL, but also fixes GCN ?
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Andrew Stubbs
Date: 2023-11-07 18:09
To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
CC: jeffreya...@gmail.com; rguent...@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr97428.c for RVV
On 07/11/2023 07:44
On 07/11/2023 07:44, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
This test shows vectorizing stmts using SLP 4 times instead of 2 for RVV.
The reason is RVV has 512 bit vector.
Here is comparison between RVV ans ARM SVE:
https://godbolt.org/z/xc5KE5rPs
But I notice AMDGCN also has 512 bit vector, seems this patch will c
This test shows vectorizing stmts using SLP 4 times instead of 2 for RVV.
The reason is RVV has 512 bit vector.
Here is comparison between RVV ans ARM SVE:
https://godbolt.org/z/xc5KE5rPs
But I notice AMDGCN also has 512 bit vector, seems this patch will cause FAIL
in GCN ?
Not sure whether GCN
12 matches
Mail list logo
