On 05/01/2017 04:23 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
I happened to notice that stack adjustment code was confusingly testing
for an unsigned value being > 0. In this case unadjusted_alignment is
of type unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT, so the 'else' portion of the has no effect.
This patch simplifies the adj
I happened to notice that stack adjustment code was confusingly testing for an
unsigned value being > 0. In this case unadjusted_alignment is of type unsigned
HOST_WIDE_INT, so the 'else' portion of the has no effect.
This patch simplifies the adjustment to be less confusing (IMHO).
booted an
