On 2/23/21 5:18 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 2/23/21 4:53 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> The patch is okay for trunk and for 10. Thank you!
>
> Fixed and pushed to trunk. I'll push the backport after a day or two
> of burn in on trunk. Thanks!
Pushed to gcc10, so fixed everywhere.
Peter
On 2/23/21 4:53 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 04:00:42PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> (mma_assemble_pair): Add compatibility built-in.
> s/Add/New/ is better (it makes clear you do not add something to the
> (already existing) mma_assemble_pair, that it is
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 04:00:42PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> (mma_assemble_pair): Add compatibility built-in.
s/Add/New/ is better (it makes clear you do not add something to the
(already existing) mma_assemble_pair, that it is in fact new here).
> (mma_init_builtins): USE VSX
On 2/5/21 12:28 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 04:11:30PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Peter Bergner:
>>> On 2/5/21 4:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Maybe add a check that the compatibility builtins are flagged as
availble using __has_builtin?
>>>
>>> Do you me
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 04:11:30PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Peter Bergner:
> > On 2/5/21 4:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> Maybe add a check that the compatibility builtins are flagged as
> >> availble using __has_builtin?
> >
> > Do you mean add a test in the testsuite for this? I can c
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:05:19PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 2/4/21 3:16 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 02:40:20PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> >> The LLVM and GCC teams agreed to rename the __builtin_mma_assemble_pair and
> >> __builtin_mma_disassemble_pair built
* Peter Bergner:
> On 2/5/21 4:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Peter Bergner via Gcc-patches:
>>
>>> The LLVM and GCC teams agreed to rename the __builtin_mma_assemble_pair and
>>> __builtin_mma_disassemble_pair built-ins to __builtin_vsx_assemble_pair and
>>> __builtin_vsx_disassemble_pair res
On 2/5/21 4:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Peter Bergner via Gcc-patches:
>
>> The LLVM and GCC teams agreed to rename the __builtin_mma_assemble_pair and
>> __builtin_mma_disassemble_pair built-ins to __builtin_vsx_assemble_pair and
>> __builtin_vsx_disassemble_pair respectively. It's too late
* Peter Bergner via Gcc-patches:
> The LLVM and GCC teams agreed to rename the __builtin_mma_assemble_pair and
> __builtin_mma_disassemble_pair built-ins to __builtin_vsx_assemble_pair and
> __builtin_vsx_disassemble_pair respectively. It's too late to remove the
> old names, so this patch adds s
On 2/4/21 3:16 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 02:40:20PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> The LLVM and GCC teams agreed to rename the __builtin_mma_assemble_pair and
>> __builtin_mma_disassemble_pair built-ins to __builtin_vsx_assemble_pair and
>> __builtin_vsx_disas
Hi!
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 02:40:20PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> The LLVM and GCC teams agreed to rename the __builtin_mma_assemble_pair and
> __builtin_mma_disassemble_pair built-ins to __builtin_vsx_assemble_pair and
> __builtin_vsx_disassemble_pair respectively. It's too late to remove the
The LLVM and GCC teams agreed to rename the __builtin_mma_assemble_pair and
__builtin_mma_disassemble_pair built-ins to __builtin_vsx_assemble_pair and
__builtin_vsx_disassemble_pair respectively. It's too late to remove the
old names, so this patch adds support for creating compatibility built-in
12 matches
Mail list logo
