Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement C++23 P1659R3 starts_with and ends_with

On Mon, 19 May 2025, Tomasz Kaminski wrote: > > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:59 AM Tomasz Kaminski wrote: > > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:47 AM Patrick Palka wrote: > I would appreciate a short explanation on the approach being put here,  > in the message. Like passing -1 as means of saying,

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement C++23 P1659R3 starts_with and ends_with

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:09 PM Tomasz Kaminski wrote: > > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:02 PM Patrick Palka wrote: > >> On Mon, 19 May 2025, Tomasz Kaminski wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:47 AM Patrick Palka >> wrote: >> > I would appreciate a short explanation on the approac

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement C++23 P1659R3 starts_with and ends_with

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:05 PM Patrick Palka wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2025, Tomasz Kaminski wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:59 AM Tomasz Kaminski > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:47 AM Patrick Palka wrote: > > I would appreciate a short explanation on the approach b

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement C++23 P1659R3 starts_with and ends_with

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:02 PM Patrick Palka wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2025, Tomasz Kaminski wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:47 AM Patrick Palka wrote: > > I would appreciate a short explanation on the approach being put here, > > in the message. Like passing -1 as means of saying,

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement C++23 P1659R3 starts_with and ends_with

On Mon, 19 May 2025, Tomasz Kaminski wrote: > > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:47 AM Patrick Palka wrote: > I would appreciate a short explanation on the approach being put here,  > in the message. Like passing -1 as means of saying, size not know. > > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does th

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement C++23 P1659R3 starts_with and ends_with

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:59 AM Tomasz Kaminski wrote: > > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:47 AM Patrick Palka wrote: > I would appreciate a short explanation on the approach being put here, > in the message. Like passing -1 as means of saying, size not know. > > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement C++23 P1659R3 starts_with and ends_with

On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 10:35, Tomasz Kaminski wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 11:29 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 05:46, Patrick Palka wrote: >> > >> > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? >> > >> > -- >8 -- >> > >> > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement C++23 P1659R3 starts_with and ends_with

On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 05:46, Patrick Palka wrote: > > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? > > -- >8 -- > > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: > > * include/bits/ranges_algo.h (__starts_with_fn, starts_with): > Define. > (__ends_with_fn, ends_with): Define. >

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement C++23 P1659R3 starts_with and ends_with

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 11:29 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 05:46, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? > > > > -- >8 -- > > > > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: > > > > * include/bits/ranges_algo.h (__starts_with_fn, starts

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement C++23 P1659R3 starts_with and ends_with

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:47 AM Patrick Palka wrote: I would appreciate a short explanation on the approach being put here, in the message. Like passing -1 as means of saying, size not know. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? > >From the non-stylistic changes, I have noti

[PATCH] libstdc++: Implement C++23 P1659R3 starts_with and ends_with

Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? -- >8 -- libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/bits/ranges_algo.h (__starts_with_fn, starts_with): Define. (__ends_with_fn, ends_with): Define. * include/bits/version.def (ranges_starts_ends_with): Define.