On 28/05/25 15:20 -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
Change in this version:
* Add test using an integer-class distance type, based on views::iota.
OK for trunk, thank you both for all the work on this!
-- >8 --
This implements ranges::starts_with and ranges::ends_with from the C++23
paper P1659R
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:20 PM Patrick Palka wrote:
> Change in this version:
>
> * Add test using an integer-class distance type, based on views::iota.
>
> -- >8 --
>
> This implements ranges::starts_with and ranges::ends_with from the C++23
> paper P1659R3. The logic of these algorithms is
Change in this version:
* Add test using an integer-class distance type, based on views::iota.
-- >8 --
This implements ranges::starts_with and ranges::ends_with from the C++23
paper P1659R3. The logic of these algorithms is contained in an _S_impl
member function that takes optional size par
On Mon, 19 May 2025, Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:59 AM Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:47 AM Patrick Palka wrote:
> I would appreciate a short explanation on the approach being put here,
> in the message. Like passing -1 as means of saying,
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:09 PM Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:02 PM Patrick Palka wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 19 May 2025, Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:47 AM Patrick Palka
>> wrote:
>> > I would appreciate a short explanation on the approac
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:05 PM Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2025, Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:59 AM Tomasz Kaminski
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:47 AM Patrick Palka wrote:
> > I would appreciate a short explanation on the approach b
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:02 PM Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2025, Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:47 AM Patrick Palka wrote:
> > I would appreciate a short explanation on the approach being put here,
> > in the message. Like passing -1 as means of saying,
On Mon, 19 May 2025, Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:47 AM Patrick Palka wrote:
> I would appreciate a short explanation on the approach being put here,
> in the message. Like passing -1 as means of saying, size not know.
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does th
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:59 AM Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:47 AM Patrick Palka wrote:
> I would appreciate a short explanation on the approach being put here,
> in the message. Like passing -1 as means of saying, size not know.
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does
On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 10:35, Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 11:29 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 05:46, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> >
>> > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
>> >
>> > -- >8 --
>> >
>> > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 05:46, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
>
> -- >8 --
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/bits/ranges_algo.h (__starts_with_fn, starts_with):
> Define.
> (__ends_with_fn, ends_with): Define.
>
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 11:29 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 05:46, Patrick Palka wrote:
> >
> > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
> >
> > -- >8 --
> >
> > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * include/bits/ranges_algo.h (__starts_with_fn, starts
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:47 AM Patrick Palka wrote:
I would appreciate a short explanation on the approach being put here,
in the message. Like passing -1 as means of saying, size not know.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
>
>From the non-stylistic changes, I have noti
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/bits/ranges_algo.h (__starts_with_fn, starts_with):
Define.
(__ends_with_fn, ends_with): Define.
* include/bits/version.def (ranges_starts_ends_with): Define.
14 matches
Mail list logo