On Feb 25, 2021, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Navigating and debugging causes for failing tests here isn't
> helped by the existence of tests with duplicate names.
Aah, I guess I see what happened: some test sets were copied to cover
additional cases I hadn't covered (cool :-), but the test names
> From: Jeff Law
> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 23:39:27 +0100
> received-spf: None (smtp1.axis.com: no sender authenticity information
> available from domain of postmas...@mail-il1-f172.google.com) identity=helo;
> client-ip=209.85.166.172; receiver=smtp1.axis.com;
> envelope-from="jeffreya...@g
On 2/24/21 10:17 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches wrote:
> The gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp tests can take some effort to
> digest.
>
> Navigating and debugging causes for failing tests here isn't
> helped by the existence of tests with duplicate names.
> Let's stop that from happening. Thi
The gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp tests can take some effort to
digest.
Navigating and debugging causes for failing tests here isn't
helped by the existence of tests with duplicate names.
Let's stop that from happening. This requires that test-run
output is actually reviewed, as Tcl errors don't sto
