On 09/11/2017 03:59 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Max Filippov writes:
>>> 2017-09-11 Max Filippov
>>> gcc/
>>> * expmed.c (emit_store_flag_int): Initialize rtx tem.
>>
>> LGTM, thanks, but I can't approve it.
>>
Hi Richard,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Max Filippov writes:
>> 2017-09-11 Max Filippov
>> gcc/
>> * expmed.c (emit_store_flag_int): Initialize rtx tem.
>
> LGTM, thanks, but I can't approve it.
>
> This makes the later "tem = 0;" redundant, so perhaps it
Max Filippov writes:
> 2017-09-11 Max Filippov
> gcc/
> * expmed.c (emit_store_flag_int): Initialize rtx tem.
LGTM, thanks, but I can't approve it.
This makes the later "tem = 0;" redundant, so perhaps it would make
sense to delete that too? There again, it was redundant before the
spl
2017-09-11 Max Filippov
gcc/
* expmed.c (emit_store_flag_int): Initialize rtx tem.
---
gcc/expmed.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/expmed.c b/gcc/expmed.c
index 7f0cb0a0ec05..945ab3d656a2 100644
--- a/gcc/expmed.c
+++ b/gcc/expmed.c
@@ -5601,7 +5