Re: [PATCH] c++: NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR is not potentially constant [PR104507]

On 4/12/22 15:48, Patrick Palka wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 2:47 PM Patrick Palka wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Jason Merrill wrote: On 2/15/22 17:00, Patrick Palka wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Jason Merrill wrote: On 2/15/22 15:13, Patrick Palka wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Patrick Palka

Re: [PATCH] c++: NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR is not potentially constant [PR104507]

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 2:47 PM Patrick Palka wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > On 2/15/22 17:00, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > > > > > On 2/15/22 15:13, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Patrick Palka wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] c++: NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR is not potentially constant [PR104507]

On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 2/15/22 17:00, Patrick Palka wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > > > On 2/15/22 15:13, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > > On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > > > > > > > Here we're crashing from potential_constant_expres

Re: [PATCH] c++: NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR is not potentially constant [PR104507]

On 2/15/22 17:00, Patrick Palka wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Jason Merrill wrote: On 2/15/22 15:13, Patrick Palka wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Patrick Palka wrote: Here we're crashing from potential_constant_expression because it tries to perform trial evaluation of the first operand '(bool)__

Re: [PATCH] c++: NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR is not potentially constant [PR104507]

On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 2/15/22 15:13, Patrick Palka wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > > > Here we're crashing from potential_constant_expression because it tries > > > to perform trial evaluation of the first operand '(bool)__r' of the > > > conjun

Re: [PATCH] c++: NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR is not potentially constant [PR104507]

On 2/15/22 15:13, Patrick Palka wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Patrick Palka wrote: Here we're crashing from potential_constant_expression because it tries to perform trial evaluation of the first operand '(bool)__r' of the conjunction (which is overall wrapped in a NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR), but cxx_ev

Re: [PATCH] c++: NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR is not potentially constant [PR104507]

On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Patrick Palka wrote: > Here we're crashing from potential_constant_expression because it tries > to perform trial evaluation of the first operand '(bool)__r' of the > conjunction (which is overall wrapped in a NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR), but > cxx_eval_constant_expression ICEs on unh

[PATCH] c++: NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR is not potentially constant [PR104507]

Here we're crashing from potential_constant_expression because it tries to perform trial evaluation of the first operand '(bool)__r' of the conjunction (which is overall wrapped in a NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR), but cxx_eval_constant_expression ICEs on unhandled trees (of which CAST_EXPR is one). Since cx