After reviewing the entire dependencies to get this enabled by
default, our current plan is as follows:
1. Send a v2 (there still were outstanding comments against some
testcases) of the "turn on by default for -O2" patch.
2. Address PR118873, PR119862, and PR119884 before merging the patch
that tu
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 4:51 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/18/25 2:43 AM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> > Applied to trunk (16.0.0), thank you!
> > Should this be backported to the GCC-15 release branch as well?
> We don't have this on by default on the branch and it's a new option, so
> one could ma
On 4/18/25 4:37 PM, Sam James wrote:
Philipp Tomsich writes:
Applied to trunk (16.0.0), thank you!
Should this be backported to the GCC-15 release branch as well?
BTW, what's the plan for enabling this on trunk now by default? (I don't recall
if
some other issues were left.)
There's alr
Philipp Tomsich writes:
> Applied to trunk (16.0.0), thank you!
> Should this be backported to the GCC-15 release branch as well?
BTW, what's the plan for enabling this on trunk now by default? (I don't recall
if
some other issues were left.)
On 4/18/25 2:43 AM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
Applied to trunk (16.0.0), thank you!
Should this be backported to the GCC-15 release branch as well?
We don't have this on by default on the branch and it's a new option, so
one could make the argument it's not a regression and inappropriate.
But o
Applied to trunk (16.0.0), thank you!
Should this be backported to the GCC-15 release branch as well?
--Philipp.
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 10:10, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>
> Jeff,
>
>
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 at 01:48, Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/28/25 5:12 AM, Konstantinos Eleftheriou wrote:
Jeff,
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 at 01:48, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/28/25 5:12 AM, Konstantinos Eleftheriou wrote:
> > In the case that we are eliminating the load instruction, we use zero_extend
> > for the initialization of the base register for the zero-offset store.
> > This causes issues when
On 3/28/25 5:12 AM, Konstantinos Eleftheriou wrote:
In the case that we are eliminating the load instruction, we use zero_extend
for the initialization of the base register for the zero-offset store.
This causes issues when the store and the load use the same mode,
as we are trying to generate
In the case that we are eliminating the load instruction, we use zero_extend
for the initialization of the base register for the zero-offset store.
This causes issues when the store and the load use the same mode,
as we are trying to generate a zero_extend with the same inner and
outer modes.
This
