Re: [PATCH] Use cgraph_node::dump_{asm_},name where possible.

On 1/9/20 2:25 AM, luoxhu wrote: On 2020/1/8 22:54, Martin Liška wrote: diff --git a/gcc/cgraphclones.c b/gcc/cgraphclones.c index bd44063a1ac..789564ba335 100644 --- a/gcc/cgraphclones.c +++ b/gcc/cgraphclones.c @@ -1148,8 +1148,7 @@ symbol_table::materialize_all_clones (void)     if

Re: [PATCH] Use cgraph_node::dump_{asm_},name where possible.

On 2020/1/8 22:54, Martin Liška wrote: diff --git a/gcc/cgraphclones.c b/gcc/cgraphclones.c index bd44063a1ac..789564ba335 100644 --- a/gcc/cgraphclones.c +++ b/gcc/cgraphclones.c @@ -1148,8 +1148,7 @@ symbol_table::materialize_all_clones (void) if (symtab->dump_file)

Re: [PATCH] Use cgraph_node::dump_{asm_},name where possible.

> Hi. > > The patch consistent usage of cgraph_node::dump_{asm_,}name where possible. > > Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests. > > Ready to be installed? OK, thanks! Not all dump_name/dump_asm_name choices are fully logical, but I see it is comming form name/as

[PATCH] Use cgraph_node::dump_{asm_},name where possible.

Hi. The patch consistent usage of cgraph_node::dump_{asm_,}name where possible. Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests. Ready to be installed? Thanks, Martin gcc/ChangeLog: 2020-01-08 Martin Liska * cgraph.c (cgraph_node::dump): Use ::dump_name or