On 1/9/20 2:25 AM, luoxhu wrote:
On 2020/1/8 22:54, Martin Liška wrote:diff --git a/gcc/cgraphclones.c b/gcc/cgraphclones.c index bd44063a1ac..789564ba335 100644 --- a/gcc/cgraphclones.c +++ b/gcc/cgraphclones.c @@ -1148,8 +1148,7 @@ symbol_table::materialize_all_clones (void) if (symtab->dump_file) { fprintf (symtab->dump_file, "cloning %s to %s\n", - xstrdup_for_dump (node->clone_of->name ()), - xstrdup_for_dump (node->name ())); + node->clone_of->dump_name (), node->name ());Also node->dump_name () here?
Yep, thank you for the note. I'm going to install the obvious patch. Martin
>From 16ba88890581aa4398789b8670eb39792c8b107f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Liska <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 09:21:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] One more usage of cgraph_node::dump_name. gcc/ChangeLog: 2020-01-09 Martin Liska <[email protected]> * cgraphclones.c (symbol_table::materialize_all_clones): Use cgraph_node::dump_name. --- gcc/cgraphclones.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/cgraphclones.c b/gcc/cgraphclones.c index 789564ba335..9b1cc3e3930 100644 --- a/gcc/cgraphclones.c +++ b/gcc/cgraphclones.c @@ -1148,7 +1148,8 @@ symbol_table::materialize_all_clones (void) if (symtab->dump_file) { fprintf (symtab->dump_file, "cloning %s to %s\n", - node->clone_of->dump_name (), node->name ()); + node->clone_of->dump_name (), + node->dump_name ()); if (node->clone.tree_map) { unsigned int i; -- 2.24.1
