On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> While testing other patches also with -masm=intel, I've noticed that
>> several insns output wrong mem sizes. The following patch fixes what I
>> found. %w1/%k1/%q1 will still %xmmN
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> While testing other patches also with -masm=intel, I've noticed that
> several insns output wrong mem sizes. The following patch fixes what I
> found. %w1/%k1/%q1 will still %xmmN if it is a register and for AT&T
> syntax will print memory
Hi!
While testing other patches also with -masm=intel, I've noticed that
several insns output wrong mem sizes. The following patch fixes what I
found. %w1/%k1/%q1 will still %xmmN if it is a register and for AT&T
syntax will print memory as normally, but for -masm=intel it will
print WORD PTR/DW
