"Sebastian Perta" writes:
>>>Looks OK to me, but wait a day or two for a docs person to comment on...
> 6 days no comments so far, can I check in now?
Yup, go ahead.
>>>if the new line is too long
> There are many other lines which have the same length or are even longer
> this is why I let it a
02-12 Tamar Christina
PR target/82641
> -Original Message-
> From: DJ Delorie [mailto:d...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 06 February 2018 22:57
> To: Sebastian Perta
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] RL78 new "vector" function attribute
>
>
Sebastian Perta writes:
> I've updated the patch (extend.texi) as you suggested.
> Please let me know if this is OK to check-in, thank you!
Looks OK to me, but wait a day or two for a docs person to comment on...
> -On RX targets, you may specify one or more vector numbers as arguments
> +On RX
id __attribute__ ((interrupt)) interrupt_handler ();
+
+void interrupt_handler ()
+{
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "tableentry" } } */
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DJ Delorie [mailto:d...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 29 January 2018 21:11
> To: Sebastian Perta
> Cc:
If the RX and RL78 now share interrupt/vector semantics, can we combine
the docs? I.e. instead of a new section for RL78, can we change the RX
section to say something like "For RX and RL78..." ?
Hello,
The below patch adds a new vector attribute for RL78, it is basically a copy
past of what DJ has done for RX a while ago:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg02387.html
The patch adds also a test case and updates extend.texi with the new
attribute.
Regression test is OK, tested
