On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 2:32 AM Patrick O'Neill wrote:
>
> Does relax mean no longer enforcing the canonical order of extensions?
Yes, we've discussed that a long time ago, but we just didn't have
enough people to moving that forward:
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-toolchain-conventions/
Does relax mean no longer enforcing the canonical order of extensions?
Patrick
On 11/14/23 17:52, Kito Cheng wrote:
LGTM, and BTW...I am thinking we could relax the canonical order
during parsing, did you have interesting and time working on that
item?
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 9:35 AM Patrick
LGTM, and BTW...I am thinking we could relax the canonical order
during parsing, did you have interesting and time working on that
item?
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 9:35 AM Patrick O'Neill wrote:
>
> Passing in a base extension in non-canonical order (i, e, g) causes GCC
> to ICE:
> xgcc: error: '-ma
Passing in a base extension in non-canonical order (i, e, g) causes GCC
to ICE:
xgcc: error: '-march=rv64ge': ISA string is not in canonical order. 'e'
xgcc: internal compiler error: in add, at
common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc:671
...
This is fixed by skipping to the next extension when a non-
