Does relax mean no longer enforcing the canonical order of extensions?
Patrick On 11/14/23 17:52, Kito Cheng wrote:
LGTM, and BTW...I am thinking we could relax the canonical order during parsing, did you have interesting and time working on that item? On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 9:35 AM Patrick O'Neill<[email protected]> wrote:Passing in a base extension in non-canonical order (i, e, g) causes GCC to ICE: xgcc: error: '-march=rv64ge': ISA string is not in canonical order. 'e' xgcc: internal compiler error: in add, at common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc:671 ... This is fixed by skipping to the next extension when a non-canonical order is detected. gcc/ChangeLog: * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc (riscv_subset_list::parse_std_ext): Emit an error and skip to the next extension when a non-canonical ordering is detected.
