On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:08:44PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:08:01PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> Btw, I have nothing against changing TRANSLA
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:08:44PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:08:01PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> Btw, I have nothing against changing TRANSLATION_UNIT_LANGUAGE
> >> to DW_LANG_* directly - we only use
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:08:01PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> Btw, I have nothing against changing TRANSLATION_UNIT_LANGUAGE
>> to DW_LANG_* directly - we only use it for choosing the language
>> of the dwarf unit. This would of course
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:08:01PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> Btw, I have nothing against changing TRANSLATION_UNIT_LANGUAGE
> to DW_LANG_* directly - we only use it for choosing the language
> of the dwarf unit. This would of course mean to change its initialization
> from
>
> TRANSLATION_
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:46:39PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> I don't mind changing the language hook to return the actual DW_LANG_*
>> constant directly, that seems like a nice cleanup.
>>
>> But I don't think we can just replace TRANSLA
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:46:39PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I don't mind changing the language hook to return the actual DW_LANG_*
> constant directly, that seems like a nice cleanup.
>
> But I don't think we can just replace TRANSLATION_UNIT_LANGUAGE and
> lang_hooks.name. The name is (expli
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 16:33 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:21:09PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > I think we want this (also extended for C11/C++11/C++14 afterwards), even
> > > when the early debug bits won't
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:21:09PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:50:19PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 10:33 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:13 +0200, Mark Wie
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:50:19PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 10:33 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:13 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> > > This patch was written a long time ago by Jakub and
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:50:19PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 10:33 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:13 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > This patch was written a long time ago by Jakub and has been in Fedora
> > > gcc for some time. All I did was re
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 10:33 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:13 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > This patch was written a long time ago by Jakub and has been in Fedora
> > gcc for some time. All I did was rebase it to current gcc trunk
> > and add a testcase. Back when it was o
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:13 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> This patch was written a long time ago by Jakub and has been in Fedora
> gcc for some time. All I did was rebase it to current gcc trunk
> and add a testcase. Back when it was originally proposed the issue was
> that because DWARF was genera
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:35 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:29:38PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:17 +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:13:55PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > > This lang hook will be more useful when D
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:29:38PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:17 +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:13:55PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > This lang hook will be more useful when DWARFv5 gets out, which is
> > > supposed to define language iden
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:17 +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:13:55PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > This lang hook will be more useful when DWARFv5 gets out, which is
> > supposed to define language identifiers for newer C and C++ versions.
>
> It might have been discusse
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:13:55PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch was written a long time ago by Jakub and has been in Fedora
> gcc for some time. All I did was rebase it to current gcc trunk
> and add a testcase. Back when it was originally proposed the issue was
> that because
Hi,
This patch was written a long time ago by Jakub and has been in Fedora
gcc for some time. All I did was rebase it to current gcc trunk
and add a testcase. Back when it was originally proposed the issue was
that because DWARF was generated late adding new lang hooks for this
was problematic for
17 matches
Mail list logo
