On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:35 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:29:38PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:17 +0200, Marek Polacek wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:13:55PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > > This lang hook will be more useful when DWARFv5 gets out, which is > > > > supposed to define language identifiers for newer C and C++ versions. > > > > > > It might have been discussed elsewhere, so sorry for not paying attention, > > > but what about DW_LANG_C11? > > > > That is one of the new language versions to hopefully gets a definition > > with DWARFv5. http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=140330.1 > > Yeah, that is 0x1d it seems, but we don't have > DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14 > unfortunately. IMHO still something that must be added to DWARF5.
Good point. There is a proposal to add DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_03 (0x17) and DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11 (0x18) http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=120628.1 But no DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14 yet. Probably because C++14 only got approved last August. Although it has been too late to submit new proposals for DWARFv5 since a couple of months now I did submit one anyway. Hopefully we can still sneak it in before there is a first draft of DWARFv5 out. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.standards.dwarf/218 Cheers, Mark
