On Thu, 30 May 2019, Alex Henrie wrote:
> In Wine we need a way to (without warnings) put ms_hook_prologue into
> a macro that is applied to functions, function pointers, and function
> pointer typedefs. It sounds like you're saying that you will not
> accept a patch that silences or splits off wa
On Fri, 31 May 2019, Alex Henrie wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 1:38 AM Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 30 May 2019, Alex Henrie wrote:
> >
> > > In Wine we need a way to (without warnings) put ms_hook_prologue into
> > > a macro that is applied to functions, function pointers, and functi
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 1:38 AM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2019, Alex Henrie wrote:
>
> > In Wine we need a way to (without warnings) put ms_hook_prologue into
> > a macro that is applied to functions, function pointers, and function
> > pointer typedefs. It sounds like you're saying
On Thu, 30 May 2019, Alex Henrie wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 6:59 PM Joseph Myers wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 30 May 2019, Alex Henrie wrote:
> >
> > > At this point I think I'm convinced that any attribute that applies to
> > > a function should also be allowed on a function pointer without any
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 6:59 PM Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2019, Alex Henrie wrote:
>
> > At this point I think I'm convinced that any attribute that applies to
> > a function should also be allowed on a function pointer without any
> > warnings. We can start by turning off the warning
On Thu, 30 May 2019, Alex Henrie wrote:
> At this point I think I'm convinced that any attribute that applies to
> a function should also be allowed on a function pointer without any
> warnings. We can start by turning off the warnings for the "fndecl"
> attributes and then clean up the other attr
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 1:05 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 5/24/19 9:49 AM, Alex Henrie wrote:
> > Then is it preferable to simply silence Wattributes in this case?
>
> This case being PR86407? I'd say yes.
> Attribute malloc attaches only to fndecl and not its type but
> doesn't affect the code
On Tue, 28 May 2019, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 5/24/19 9:49 AM, Alex Henrie wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:01 AM Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm not sure we really need a new warning for this.
> >
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:23 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think GCC
On 5/24/19 9:49 AM, Alex Henrie wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:01 AM Richard Biener wrote:
I'm not sure we really need a new warning for this.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:23 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
I don't think GCC makes a formal distinction between function
attributes that affect only fu
On Sat, 25 May 2019, Alex Henrie wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 12:34 AM Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On May 24, 2019 5:49:38 PM GMT+02:00, Alex Henrie
> > wrote:
> > >As far as I can tell, "fndecl" is a misnomer: these attributes are
> > >more accurately called "function definition attribut
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 12:34 AM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On May 24, 2019 5:49:38 PM GMT+02:00, Alex Henrie
> wrote:
> >As far as I can tell, "fndecl" is a misnomer: these attributes are
> >more accurately called "function definition attributes", i.e.
> >attributes that affect the assembly code
On May 24, 2019 5:49:38 PM GMT+02:00, Alex Henrie
wrote:
>On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:01 AM Richard Biener
>wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure we really need a new warning for this.
>
>On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:23 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>>
>> I don't think GCC makes a formal distinction between function
>
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:01 AM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> I'm not sure we really need a new warning for this.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:23 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> I don't think GCC makes a formal distinction between function
> attributes that affect only function definitions vs those that
> a
On 5/23/19 9:57 PM, Alex Henrie wrote:
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86407#c6
---
gcc/c-family/c.opt | 4
gcc/c/c-decl.c | 4 +++-
gcc/config/i386/i386-options.c | 12 ++--
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr8640
On Thu, 23 May 2019, Alex Henrie wrote:
> ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86407#c6
> ---
> gcc/c-family/c.opt | 4
> gcc/c/c-decl.c | 4 +++-
> gcc/config/i386/i386-options.c | 12 ++--
> gcc/testsuite/c-c++-com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86407#c6
---
gcc/c-family/c.opt | 4
gcc/c/c-decl.c | 4 +++-
gcc/config/i386/i386-options.c | 12 ++--
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr86407-1.c | 23 +++
gcc/tests
16 matches
Mail list logo
