On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:13:31PM +0100, Roger Sayle wrote:
[ You attached something binary, which makes it hard to reply to. ]
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr96298.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +/* PR rtl-optimization/96298 */
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-for
I was considering committing this new test case as obvious, however I've
decided to err on the side of caution and ask folks whether they have
any suggestions or improvements to my proposed dejagnu directives.
This test now passes with the recently committed fix for this regression,
but fails with
